Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What potential problems are there with this medium armor fix?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hillsy7" data-source="post: 7159962" data-attributes="member: 6689191"><p>Generally speaking, the only main issue is you've nerfed Barbarian Unarmoured Defence until Con gets up to 20 - most every Barbarian now is going to default to Medium Armour and Low Dex (they might add Dex back on for saves tho). Conan is no more. But generally speaking, meh, not too much of an issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>With bounded accuracy, mucking about with AC is always an issue for monsters and balance. and if fully a third of potentially affected Monsters see a rise, that could be a problem. Doubly so if they are mainly low level grunts who need the armour boost. For example, A CR 2 Ogre has AC 11 for a reason. That cranks up to AC 14 and that's a significant boost with 59 HP. I mean realistically you could lob that at a 5-man Level 1 party....If average attack damage is, say, 1d8+3 and average attack bonus is +5, that means you're averaging (60%*7.5) 4.5 damage per turn instead of 5.625. That might not seem much, but that's 14 attack rolls vs 10. With buffs, healing, maybe someone knocked unconscious.......could be a couple of turns of combat.....</p><p></p><p>Basically, I'd increase CR of those monsters accordingly, or ignore the medium armour buff for them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The question as to whether or not Medium armour does it's job depends on who can use it, and who might multiclass/burn a feat to get it.</p><p></p><p>Straight off the bat you can narrow it down who has medium, but not Heavy: Barbarian, Ranger, Knowledge Cleric, Valour Bard, Druid. So who benefits from it existing, currently.</p><p></p><p><strong>Barbarian </strong>doesn't really. With +3 in CON (likely) you're starting at 13 anyway so Unarmoured Defence coupled with resistances covers the unlikely event first few levels you find a breastplate. Plus you get to play Conan.</p><p><strong>Ranger and Valour Bard</strong> probably benefits non-thematic builds. Traditionally, these classes lean towards Dex (light armour) over Str and are both melee (have a primary attack stat), but if you want a STR build with a non-sucky AC Medium armour is there for you.</p><p><strong>Knowledge Cleric</strong> benefits traditional themes. Clerics are thematically STR melee, and tend towards casting anyway, so Medium is a cheap AC buff.</p><p><strong>Druid </strong>is a caster, so a cheap AC buff is useful.</p><p></p><p>Of the Light Armour characters, realistically burning a feat or multiclassing only works for <strong>really </strong>wonky Rogues, Monks and Bladelocks (i.e. people who've clearly taken the seriously subverted choice for character/thematic reasons). Bards and Blastlocks could get cheap AC hikes, but the cost of a feat is expensive. So probably multiclass dips of Druid/Cleric I'd expect. They'd then fall under Druids (medium armour casters)</p><p></p><p>OK, so currently out of STR Bards & Rangers, knowledge Clerics, and Druids (including medium armour casters), who gets <em>hurt </em>by current Medium armour rules?</p><p></p><p>Druids & Clerics benefit - They are unlikely to hike to Dex over 15 because of an attack stat necessitating Light Armour, therefore you get better armour for free. Anyway, being full casters, you're hanging around out back anyway. This is good stuff and allows you to focus on other stats other than WIS. The alternative is Light Armour and being wedded to huge DEX, or accepting a terrible AC. All options are viable because of medium armour: Scale mail (basically locks minimum AC to 14/15....decent compared to other casters).</p><p></p><p>Therefore, the only people who lose out are non-traditional melee characters - STR bards and Rangers who want to drop DEX below 14. And I would ask the questions, is this a) a major problem, and b) warrant a rule change. In both cases, I would answer: Probably not.</p><p></p><p>Unless you plan on taking Dex above 16 as a second stat (to the detriment of other social stats or CON), then having Medium Armour in the majority of cases is better than not having it. Therefore it serves it's purpose for existing - as a gap blocker for certain classes. I can see how, if you are making the choice to pump DEX for combat optimal reasons, it might nark a bit. But if you're only concern is combat optimisation (oh I'm sorry - I meant "Progressing your character normally".......) are you really taking sub-optimal choices such as a melee STR Ranger anyway???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hillsy7, post: 7159962, member: 6689191"] Generally speaking, the only main issue is you've nerfed Barbarian Unarmoured Defence until Con gets up to 20 - most every Barbarian now is going to default to Medium Armour and Low Dex (they might add Dex back on for saves tho). Conan is no more. But generally speaking, meh, not too much of an issue. With bounded accuracy, mucking about with AC is always an issue for monsters and balance. and if fully a third of potentially affected Monsters see a rise, that could be a problem. Doubly so if they are mainly low level grunts who need the armour boost. For example, A CR 2 Ogre has AC 11 for a reason. That cranks up to AC 14 and that's a significant boost with 59 HP. I mean realistically you could lob that at a 5-man Level 1 party....If average attack damage is, say, 1d8+3 and average attack bonus is +5, that means you're averaging (60%*7.5) 4.5 damage per turn instead of 5.625. That might not seem much, but that's 14 attack rolls vs 10. With buffs, healing, maybe someone knocked unconscious.......could be a couple of turns of combat..... Basically, I'd increase CR of those monsters accordingly, or ignore the medium armour buff for them. The question as to whether or not Medium armour does it's job depends on who can use it, and who might multiclass/burn a feat to get it. Straight off the bat you can narrow it down who has medium, but not Heavy: Barbarian, Ranger, Knowledge Cleric, Valour Bard, Druid. So who benefits from it existing, currently. [B]Barbarian [/B]doesn't really. With +3 in CON (likely) you're starting at 13 anyway so Unarmoured Defence coupled with resistances covers the unlikely event first few levels you find a breastplate. Plus you get to play Conan. [B]Ranger and Valour Bard[/B] probably benefits non-thematic builds. Traditionally, these classes lean towards Dex (light armour) over Str and are both melee (have a primary attack stat), but if you want a STR build with a non-sucky AC Medium armour is there for you. [B]Knowledge Cleric[/B] benefits traditional themes. Clerics are thematically STR melee, and tend towards casting anyway, so Medium is a cheap AC buff. [B]Druid [/B]is a caster, so a cheap AC buff is useful. Of the Light Armour characters, realistically burning a feat or multiclassing only works for [B]really [/B]wonky Rogues, Monks and Bladelocks (i.e. people who've clearly taken the seriously subverted choice for character/thematic reasons). Bards and Blastlocks could get cheap AC hikes, but the cost of a feat is expensive. So probably multiclass dips of Druid/Cleric I'd expect. They'd then fall under Druids (medium armour casters) OK, so currently out of STR Bards & Rangers, knowledge Clerics, and Druids (including medium armour casters), who gets [I]hurt [/I]by current Medium armour rules? Druids & Clerics benefit - They are unlikely to hike to Dex over 15 because of an attack stat necessitating Light Armour, therefore you get better armour for free. Anyway, being full casters, you're hanging around out back anyway. This is good stuff and allows you to focus on other stats other than WIS. The alternative is Light Armour and being wedded to huge DEX, or accepting a terrible AC. All options are viable because of medium armour: Scale mail (basically locks minimum AC to 14/15....decent compared to other casters). Therefore, the only people who lose out are non-traditional melee characters - STR bards and Rangers who want to drop DEX below 14. And I would ask the questions, is this a) a major problem, and b) warrant a rule change. In both cases, I would answer: Probably not. Unless you plan on taking Dex above 16 as a second stat (to the detriment of other social stats or CON), then having Medium Armour in the majority of cases is better than not having it. Therefore it serves it's purpose for existing - as a gap blocker for certain classes. I can see how, if you are making the choice to pump DEX for combat optimal reasons, it might nark a bit. But if you're only concern is combat optimisation (oh I'm sorry - I meant "Progressing your character normally".......) are you really taking sub-optimal choices such as a melee STR Ranger anyway??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What potential problems are there with this medium armor fix?
Top