Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Essence" data-source="post: 795249" data-attributes="member: 10741">The problem I have with this idea is that it highly discourages PCs from trying to start their own schools/PrCs.&nbsp; And from a strictly logical standpoint, it leads to chicken-and-egg syndrome: if every member of a PrC needs to be trained by the previous group, where did the group start?I thought the major purpose behind the 'advice' on how to make prerequisites for a PrC (in the DMG) was to prevent the PrC from being attached to a particular class.&nbsp; The idea was to keep the option available to anyone who had the right stuff, whether they were a Rogue 9 or a Barb4/Bard2/Random j. PrC3 to get in.&nbsp; Do you think that this fundamental idea on the part of the designers was flawed?Also, is it possible for me to steer this thread back to it's starting question?&nbsp; What PrCs do you think are too broken to use, even given that I apply the above tweaks to the PrC system in general?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Essence, post: 795249, member: 10741"] The problem I have with this idea is that it highly discourages PCs from trying to start their own schools/PrCs. And from a strictly logical standpoint, it leads to chicken-and-egg syndrome: if every member of a PrC needs to be trained by the previous group, where did the group start? I thought the major purpose behind the 'advice' on how to make prerequisites for a PrC (in the DMG) was to prevent the PrC from being attached to a particular class. The idea was to keep the option available to anyone who had the right stuff, whether they were a Rogue 9 or a Barb4/Bard2/Random j. PrC3 to get in. Do you think that this fundamental idea on the part of the designers was flawed? Also, is it possible for me to steer this thread back to it's starting question? What PrCs do [i]you[/i] think are too broken to use, even given that I apply the above tweaks to the PrC system in general? [/QUOTE]

Verification