Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 9673215" data-attributes="member: 6779196">I agree. Like I said, if you were going to make a psionic pyrokenete, it would best be served by its own class rather than being part of the psion. And frankly, I wouldn’t even bother because I don’t think D&D’s advancement structure lends itself well to modeling the archetype.This is part of the problem with the psion, it’s trying to do too much. A single class really can’t handle the burden of representing all possible expressions of a psychic character. That’s just too broad and you end up with a flavorless pile of almost every spell in the game, with “but psionic” slapped on to make sure you know it’s special.</blockquote>