Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What should be in the Advanced Tactical Module?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fjw70" data-source="post: 6113124" data-attributes="member: 80924"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">Attacks of opportunity are already in DDN. Will there be an option for 4e style OA and making shifting an action anyone can use? Will there be an option for 3e-style AoO with standing-up and the like provoking. Just with this one rule there are three different way to do it.</span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">This bring up the point of how the tactical rules will be packaged. If there are 20 different tactical rules (to randomly pull a number of the air) that’s a lot of different combinations that could emerge. For the sake of manageability the rules will have to be grouped in some fashion. I think the simplest way to group them and cover everyone would be to have a 3e tactical rules package, a 4e tactical rules package, and a lighter 5e tactical rules package. On top of these then a few other options (such as facing) can be added. The packages would simplify the use of this module and the adventurous could mix and match if they want. </span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">I believe we need these options since a lot of 3e fans would be happy with 4e-like tactical rules and 4e fans would be happy with 3e tactical rules. </span></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">I really look forward to what they come up with. </span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fjw70, post: 6113124, member: 80924"] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]Attacks of opportunity are already in DDN. Will there be an option for 4e style OA and making shifting an action anyone can use? Will there be an option for 3e-style AoO with standing-up and the like provoking. Just with this one rule there are three different way to do it.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]This bring up the point of how the tactical rules will be packaged. If there are 20 different tactical rules (to randomly pull a number of the air) that’s a lot of different combinations that could emerge. For the sake of manageability the rules will have to be grouped in some fashion. I think the simplest way to group them and cover everyone would be to have a 3e tactical rules package, a 4e tactical rules package, and a lighter 5e tactical rules package. On top of these then a few other options (such as facing) can be added. The packages would simplify the use of this module and the adventurous could mix and match if they want. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Calibri]I believe we need these options since a lot of 3e fans would be happy with 4e-like tactical rules and 4e fans would be happy with 3e tactical rules. [/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]I really look forward to what they come up with. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What should be in the Advanced Tactical Module?
Top