Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Should Magic Be Able To Do, From a Gameplay Design Standpoint?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rmcoen" data-source="post: 9615767" data-attributes="member: 6692404"><p>This thought from TwoSix on page 2.... wow, that jumped into my head as such an amazing and simple thing. Easy too: 1 cantrip per day, per point of the associated stat (so, 16 to 20) - multiclass casters use the lowest stat. (For just a touch more, add proficiency bonus, so it's like 18 to 26? so the casters taking feats still get a <em>little</em> progression over time.) But this way the casters will need to spend their spell slots during a long day, not hoard them all for the "boss fight" while just pew-pewing their 2d10 damage through the rest of the dungeon.</p><p></p><p>(combats in my game are more "8-12 rounds" than the white room web conversations that toss around "3 rounds of combat" examples. so two fights in, you're out of cantrips! In fact, I would love to see a mechanic similar to many Class Abilities, where casters are starting to think "Is it worth sacking a spell slot, so I can get one more use of this cantrip??")</p><p></p><p>Honestly, though, I would be easily convinced to go the other extreme -- cantrips are unlimited but never more powerful (or only fractionally stronger). <em>Firebolt</em> is still doing 1d10 in the archmage's hands, that's <em>why</em> he learned more powerful spells! He still doesn't need to carry a heavy crossbow, but he's gonna tap you with a <em>lightning bolt </em>not a <em>lightning lure</em>.</p><p></p><p>Per the OP's question though, 32 pages ago... My answer for "what should magic be able to accomplish" is "depends on the campaign". Previous campaign, the PCs were planes-hopping, friends with planetars, and summoning elder deities for Q&A sessions. This campaign, <em>dimension door</em> is the most powerful spell in the party's hands - and their foes (mostly) have nothing more powerful than <em>fly</em> or <em>fireball</em>. [Exceptions abound, both "low spells w/upcasting" and the ogre mage's <em>cone of cold.</em>] Because that's the campaign feel we wanted.</p><p></p><p>As a baseline, though, I think magic should get more dangerous and/or more difficult as the spells get more powerful. I don't want fledgling wizards growing tentacles or causing explosions of pink posies just because they cast <em>mage armor</em> for the day. But maybe - like <em>Event Horizon</em> (the movie) - <em>teleport</em> and <em>plane shift </em>come with some risk? <em>Conjure X</em> sometimes ends with the critters breaking free of control (like the <em>old</em> <em>conjure elemental</em> spell!) and rampaging until put down? Anyone remember the Midkemia novels, and the mage who always had fresh fruit? He didn't conjure it, he was actually (magically) stealing it from a specific merchant's fruit stall... maybe that merchant gets fed up and hires some adventurers to find the thief!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, I absolutely prefer THEMATIC RESTRICTIONS (aka "specializations"), which previous editions had, and many people on this thread have mentioned. For all Casters! While the Necromancer uses necromancy, and maybe strays a little into enchantment (killing someone's will) and evocation (some "directed necrotic energy" spells)... the Cleric of the Moon has a lot of handy "night" and "light" based spells, curing and commanding insanity, and is great against lycanthropes. But while she's great against the enchanter, she's the wrong match against the Necromancer, because Moon magic just doesn't have anti-undead powers. The evoker can be a direct damage dealer, but a specialized "elementalist" will have more options. Tim the Evoker can blast you with fire, ice, or even concentrated pummeling blasts of air, but you need an "elementalist (fire)" to create a <em>wall of fire</em> or <em>fire shield</em>.</p><p></p><p>Without going through the entire spell list and rebalancing every spell, you can quickly establish thematic limits. Something like "Necromancers have full access [level 1 to 9] to necromantic spells, medium access [level 1 to 3] to enchantment, medium themed access to evocation, conjuration, and divination (i.e. conjure undead, but not all conjuring; <em>spirit bolt</em> for necrotic damage; ask a spirit of the owner to <em>identify</em> his item, but can't just walk up to a magic device and suss it out), and restricted access (level 1 to 3, but costs +2 spell slots) to any other wizard spell". "Clerics of the Moon have full access to all Moon-domain spells, major access (level 1 to 6) to all other spells in the Moon goddess's other domains, and restricted access to all other cleric spells."</p><p></p><p>At <em>great</em> effort, I would try building a "magical physics" rules engine that was internally consistent, and roughly balanced with martial capabilities. "Level 1 spells can manipulate 2 pounds of force, plus 1 per proficiency bonus" - enough to hit with moderate power, or create 3 "pounds" of fire, or cast haste on your familiar. Fire is the most damaging element (for example, no value judgement), which is why fire spells are so common... "a pound of fire does about 2-3 damage, while a pound of lightning is (always 1) up to 4 damage, but unreliable". So the cantrip is going to do about 4-6 fire damage or 1-8 lightning, while a 1st level spell will cause a blast of 8 to 12 fire damage (or a fan of it, doing 4-6 over a wide area); 1st level lightning does 1 to 16 damage, and refuses to become "AoE" at such low amounts. [Obviously, this is where you say "go play something other than D&D"!]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rmcoen, post: 9615767, member: 6692404"] This thought from TwoSix on page 2.... wow, that jumped into my head as such an amazing and simple thing. Easy too: 1 cantrip per day, per point of the associated stat (so, 16 to 20) - multiclass casters use the lowest stat. (For just a touch more, add proficiency bonus, so it's like 18 to 26? so the casters taking feats still get a [I]little[/I] progression over time.) But this way the casters will need to spend their spell slots during a long day, not hoard them all for the "boss fight" while just pew-pewing their 2d10 damage through the rest of the dungeon. (combats in my game are more "8-12 rounds" than the white room web conversations that toss around "3 rounds of combat" examples. so two fights in, you're out of cantrips! In fact, I would love to see a mechanic similar to many Class Abilities, where casters are starting to think "Is it worth sacking a spell slot, so I can get one more use of this cantrip??") Honestly, though, I would be easily convinced to go the other extreme -- cantrips are unlimited but never more powerful (or only fractionally stronger). [I]Firebolt[/I] is still doing 1d10 in the archmage's hands, that's [I]why[/I] he learned more powerful spells! He still doesn't need to carry a heavy crossbow, but he's gonna tap you with a [I]lightning bolt [/I]not a [I]lightning lure[/I]. Per the OP's question though, 32 pages ago... My answer for "what should magic be able to accomplish" is "depends on the campaign". Previous campaign, the PCs were planes-hopping, friends with planetars, and summoning elder deities for Q&A sessions. This campaign, [I]dimension door[/I] is the most powerful spell in the party's hands - and their foes (mostly) have nothing more powerful than [I]fly[/I] or [I]fireball[/I]. [Exceptions abound, both "low spells w/upcasting" and the ogre mage's [I]cone of cold.[/I]] Because that's the campaign feel we wanted. As a baseline, though, I think magic should get more dangerous and/or more difficult as the spells get more powerful. I don't want fledgling wizards growing tentacles or causing explosions of pink posies just because they cast [I]mage armor[/I] for the day. But maybe - like [I]Event Horizon[/I] (the movie) - [I]teleport[/I] and [I]plane shift [/I]come with some risk? [I]Conjure X[/I] sometimes ends with the critters breaking free of control (like the [I]old[/I] [I]conjure elemental[/I] spell!) and rampaging until put down? Anyone remember the Midkemia novels, and the mage who always had fresh fruit? He didn't conjure it, he was actually (magically) stealing it from a specific merchant's fruit stall... maybe that merchant gets fed up and hires some adventurers to find the thief! Also, I absolutely prefer THEMATIC RESTRICTIONS (aka "specializations"), which previous editions had, and many people on this thread have mentioned. For all Casters! While the Necromancer uses necromancy, and maybe strays a little into enchantment (killing someone's will) and evocation (some "directed necrotic energy" spells)... the Cleric of the Moon has a lot of handy "night" and "light" based spells, curing and commanding insanity, and is great against lycanthropes. But while she's great against the enchanter, she's the wrong match against the Necromancer, because Moon magic just doesn't have anti-undead powers. The evoker can be a direct damage dealer, but a specialized "elementalist" will have more options. Tim the Evoker can blast you with fire, ice, or even concentrated pummeling blasts of air, but you need an "elementalist (fire)" to create a [I]wall of fire[/I] or [I]fire shield[/I]. Without going through the entire spell list and rebalancing every spell, you can quickly establish thematic limits. Something like "Necromancers have full access [level 1 to 9] to necromantic spells, medium access [level 1 to 3] to enchantment, medium themed access to evocation, conjuration, and divination (i.e. conjure undead, but not all conjuring; [I]spirit bolt[/I] for necrotic damage; ask a spirit of the owner to [I]identify[/I] his item, but can't just walk up to a magic device and suss it out), and restricted access (level 1 to 3, but costs +2 spell slots) to any other wizard spell". "Clerics of the Moon have full access to all Moon-domain spells, major access (level 1 to 6) to all other spells in the Moon goddess's other domains, and restricted access to all other cleric spells." At [I]great[/I] effort, I would try building a "magical physics" rules engine that was internally consistent, and roughly balanced with martial capabilities. "Level 1 spells can manipulate 2 pounds of force, plus 1 per proficiency bonus" - enough to hit with moderate power, or create 3 "pounds" of fire, or cast haste on your familiar. Fire is the most damaging element (for example, no value judgement), which is why fire spells are so common... "a pound of fire does about 2-3 damage, while a pound of lightning is (always 1) up to 4 damage, but unreliable". So the cantrip is going to do about 4-6 fire damage or 1-8 lightning, while a 1st level spell will cause a blast of 8 to 12 fire damage (or a fan of it, doing 4-6 over a wide area); 1st level lightning does 1 to 16 damage, and refuses to become "AoE" at such low amounts. [Obviously, this is where you say "go play something other than D&D"!] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Should Magic Be Able To Do, From a Gameplay Design Standpoint?
Top