Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 3041317" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>I voted Greyhawk because D&amp;D is and always will be about Greyhawk. However, I rather like the position the &quot;core setting&quot; is in now. What I would truly prefer however are suggestions like that found in Heroes of Horror for running a horror campaign in published campaign worlds. Have 3 or so campaign worlds supported by the core rules and give occassional suggestions like this one for working the ideas into the world. For the core rulebooks, I would prefer these suggestions only focus on Greyhawk so that a Greyhawk rules book isn't needed and that the setting specific campaign settings (like FRCS and ECS) can have adaptions much like it is now. So a bit more attention to Greyhawk in the core rules, and notes on adaptation to the main campaign worlds everywhere else. Plus, WotC should license out any campaign worlds they aren't going to develop so that at least SOMETHING can be done with them. Having no 3e spelljammer material besides that one polyhedron magazine is annoying. What if I WANT to play spelljammer and would rather pay someone to convert it for me than do it myself? That's what this country (USA) is all about anyway!</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="airwalkrr, post: 3041317, member: 12460"] I voted Greyhawk because D&D is and always will be about Greyhawk. However, I rather like the position the "core setting" is in now. What I would truly prefer however are suggestions like that found in Heroes of Horror for running a horror campaign in published campaign worlds. Have 3 or so campaign worlds supported by the core rules and give occassional suggestions like this one for working the ideas into the world. For the core rulebooks, I would prefer these suggestions only focus on Greyhawk so that a Greyhawk rules book isn't needed and that the setting specific campaign settings (like FRCS and ECS) can have adaptions much like it is now. So a bit more attention to Greyhawk in the core rules, and notes on adaptation to the main campaign worlds everywhere else. Plus, WotC should license out any campaign worlds they aren't going to develop so that at least SOMETHING can be done with them. Having no 3e spelljammer material besides that one polyhedron magazine is annoying. What if I WANT to play spelljammer and would rather pay someone to convert it for me than do it myself? That's what this country (USA) is all about anyway! [/QUOTE]

Verification