Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 2172200" data-attributes="member: 11697">A 3.5 Faces of Evil style book. However I won't hold my breath on it. I doubt we'll ever see something on that level of depth from WotC. Their design philosophy currently just won't support such a book. Almost entirely flavor text w/ no PrCs, new PC races, items, and feats. The book is the anathema of the current design focus.And so based on that, and how spec'freaking'tacular a job that Colin McComb did on 'Faces of Evil', I partially don't want a fiend book or two simply so WotC doesn't screw up in comparison to what has already been done so well. Plus, the yugoloths will get shafted inevitably if a 3.5 fiend book gets done. The 'loths for whatever reason have just been minimized in 3e compared to the Tanar'ri and Baatezu.Now, don't get me wrong here, WotC might make a very nice book, but it'll always be judged versus 'Faces of Evil' or 'Hellbound', and damn if that's not a high standard. It's not fair for them, but it's true.Now I could always land in bizarro world and get my wish and have Colin get hired by WotC to write a new book. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Given that all, I'd rather hope for a fey book from WotC. And I want Gwen Kestrel to be among the writers.</blockquote>