Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Najo" data-source="post: 3932214" data-attributes="member: 9959">1. That is possible. Enworld still represents a market sampling and the longer the poll runs, the more accurate it gets. If you ran surveys in many places (game stores, wotc's site, conventions, fan sites like this one, in the books themselves) sure you would get a better idea. But opening discussion on a world wide forum like enworld, where the discussion and input is fairly intelligent and the fan base is very dedicated, does a decent job of weighing the pros and cons.2. Yes, I considered that. I understand that not everyone can be made happy by everything. With that said, my interests here are for the long term health of D&D and the hobby industry as a whole as I have a professional, invested interest in them both. I want D&D to do what it needs to do to bring in more customers and strengthen the existing market as much as it can. My position and opinion are based in my business experience as well as my hobbist interest.  3. I realize it is not everyone, and more a vocal minority that is doing the bashing. But, I have seen very little reason given by those supporting Golden Wyvern Adept other than it a) doesn't bug them, b) they think it is cool because they don't do much fluff or c) they really like it. I have not yet heard a solution offered by the pro-GWA camp that takes into consideration the interests of those against fluff names in core products. Most of them say change the name of the feat if you don't like it, which doesn't address any of our concerns and it makes more work for us.</blockquote>

Verification