Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What should WOTC do about Golden Wyvern Adept? (Keep Friendly)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Najo" data-source="post: 3932364" data-attributes="member: 9959"><p>The bottom line is it forces DMs to adapt their fluff to the fluff in the core books. Until now, D&D has not done that to its DMs to this degree. Sure, a few spells and gods, but not key building blocks for players to make the characters from. It is a hassle for a DM who doesn't want to have his campaign take these orders or other fluff driven feats into his game. This sort of naming belongs in setting books or sidebars. </p><p></p><p>The pro-GWA camp make it sound like this is not an issue, or that we are overreacting. But once this box is opened, it can continue to fighting styles, thieves guilds, churches, and other fluff driven by this smattering of assumed setting D&D is placing on the game now. </p><p></p><p>Even planes of existance and races are not as big a deal. Campaign Setting books usually replace those with their own, but key feats that affect basic class abilities is a big deal and impossible to ban and replace without causing confusion. </p><p></p><p>Likewise, the customer most stepped on by this is the homebrew DM. The one who has been playing for years and years, loyal through all editions he played. With years of creative and hard work, similar to a writer or artist, he is being told to alter that creation or ignore a potential intrusion into his game. </p><p></p><p>Should Forgotten Realms or Dragonlance drop these orders into their settings now? Should every D&D setting? I be curious what Tracy Hickman and Margret Weis think. How about asking Ed Greenwood and R.A. Salvatore? At that point, these orders become boring and old hat, impossible to get away from. Next time the creative teams at WOTC start cooking up new settings, they are going to have their hands much more tied than those who worked at TSR. They will see the mistake then. </p><p></p><p>This issue is bigger than people realize. It smacks in the face of the creative design side of the D&D rules, forcing the DM to use elements against his will. That is a mistake all in all, and steps on the most valuable resource D&D has, its commited and creative Dungeon Masters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Najo, post: 3932364, member: 9959"] The bottom line is it forces DMs to adapt their fluff to the fluff in the core books. Until now, D&D has not done that to its DMs to this degree. Sure, a few spells and gods, but not key building blocks for players to make the characters from. It is a hassle for a DM who doesn't want to have his campaign take these orders or other fluff driven feats into his game. This sort of naming belongs in setting books or sidebars. The pro-GWA camp make it sound like this is not an issue, or that we are overreacting. But once this box is opened, it can continue to fighting styles, thieves guilds, churches, and other fluff driven by this smattering of assumed setting D&D is placing on the game now. Even planes of existance and races are not as big a deal. Campaign Setting books usually replace those with their own, but key feats that affect basic class abilities is a big deal and impossible to ban and replace without causing confusion. Likewise, the customer most stepped on by this is the homebrew DM. The one who has been playing for years and years, loyal through all editions he played. With years of creative and hard work, similar to a writer or artist, he is being told to alter that creation or ignore a potential intrusion into his game. Should Forgotten Realms or Dragonlance drop these orders into their settings now? Should every D&D setting? I be curious what Tracy Hickman and Margret Weis think. How about asking Ed Greenwood and R.A. Salvatore? At that point, these orders become boring and old hat, impossible to get away from. Next time the creative teams at WOTC start cooking up new settings, they are going to have their hands much more tied than those who worked at TSR. They will see the mistake then. This issue is bigger than people realize. It smacks in the face of the creative design side of the D&D rules, forcing the DM to use elements against his will. That is a mistake all in all, and steps on the most valuable resource D&D has, its commited and creative Dungeon Masters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What should WOTC do about Golden Wyvern Adept? (Keep Friendly)
Top