Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What should WOTC do about Golden Wyvern Adept? (Keep Friendly)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Najo" data-source="post: 3945070" data-attributes="member: 9959"><p>I know there are people still arguing the subjective nature of the GWA issue. I think we are past that honestly. It amazes me it is still debate, when the facts are clear that this is the first time game mechanics have been this tied to fluff outside of a campaign setting book.</p><p></p><p>I said earlier in my seeking to speak to WOTC designers on the matter, I discovered that there is alot of fluff in the feats. I did get my message through to the designers with concerns. They are discussing the matter and see our points as holding validity. The issue though, which I agree with to a point, is that the high level of fluff and the new direction the core rules are taking could bring in the friends and spouses of the current D&D players and DMs that are not currently playing D&D.</p><p></p><p>If you need additional evidence of the fluff levels in the 4e core books, look at the threads going on with the races & classes book. The races have named empires. We have at the very least the basic blocks for a campaign setting built into the player's handbook from the sound of things.</p><p></p><p>Is this the right approach? I am not sure. It is good for new players and the casual friends and spouses of the D&D players who could be lured in by the new D&D. That is a good thing. It will step on the DMs who homebrew. How they can cope with it, and how much effort they need to put into adjusting, remains to be seen.</p><p></p><p>But, the anti-GWA camp is not overreacting. The rumor I have heard for the Forgotten Realms setting is it may have its own Player's Handbook and DM/ World Guide as seperate books that you use in place of the core Player's Handbook. </p><p></p><p>This would mean, we would see a new player's handbook every year with the release of a new campaign setting, which WOTC implied could happen. interesting times indeed. If this is true, then every DM who has an extensive homebrew would take the SRD and rebuild it with the fluff from his Campaign Setting and then use that instead of his Player' s Handbook. I wonder if WOTC thought about that one, and the issues that could arise if that is what DMs with their own worlds have to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Najo, post: 3945070, member: 9959"] I know there are people still arguing the subjective nature of the GWA issue. I think we are past that honestly. It amazes me it is still debate, when the facts are clear that this is the first time game mechanics have been this tied to fluff outside of a campaign setting book. I said earlier in my seeking to speak to WOTC designers on the matter, I discovered that there is alot of fluff in the feats. I did get my message through to the designers with concerns. They are discussing the matter and see our points as holding validity. The issue though, which I agree with to a point, is that the high level of fluff and the new direction the core rules are taking could bring in the friends and spouses of the current D&D players and DMs that are not currently playing D&D. If you need additional evidence of the fluff levels in the 4e core books, look at the threads going on with the races & classes book. The races have named empires. We have at the very least the basic blocks for a campaign setting built into the player's handbook from the sound of things. Is this the right approach? I am not sure. It is good for new players and the casual friends and spouses of the D&D players who could be lured in by the new D&D. That is a good thing. It will step on the DMs who homebrew. How they can cope with it, and how much effort they need to put into adjusting, remains to be seen. But, the anti-GWA camp is not overreacting. The rumor I have heard for the Forgotten Realms setting is it may have its own Player's Handbook and DM/ World Guide as seperate books that you use in place of the core Player's Handbook. This would mean, we would see a new player's handbook every year with the release of a new campaign setting, which WOTC implied could happen. interesting times indeed. If this is true, then every DM who has an extensive homebrew would take the SRD and rebuild it with the fluff from his Campaign Setting and then use that instead of his Player' s Handbook. I wonder if WOTC thought about that one, and the issues that could arise if that is what DMs with their own worlds have to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What should WOTC do about Golden Wyvern Adept? (Keep Friendly)
Top