Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What spell have you never seen cast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7643951" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>No, I get it now... you are ruling on how the spell works in a way that is vastly more generous than I would.</p><p></p><p>"Not that hard to imagine a gem, is it? Or a coin?" - Sure, but since I've never seen a party that didn't have at least one gem or coin on their person, this would invariably only detect an item already owned by the party. Also gem is far too general for my taste. Jade I would accept. Opal I would accept. Diamond I would accept. Pearl I would accept. Gem doesn't mean anything that can be pictured - it's a disparate class of things united only by value. "Crystal" might detect a lot of different precious stones because at least that's something you can picture, but would miss pearl, opal, or jade. More on that later when you start talking hinges.</p><p></p><p>"Get split up from one of your companions? Cast Locate Object on her shield, it'll at least tell you whether she's close or not." - That would actually work and is pretty cool - and I'll keep that one in mind - but if communications with your companions is the goal there are better spells for arranging that.</p><p></p><p>"Cast Locate Object and look for coffins - they're pretty easy to imagine." - That would probably work as I would accept that most coffins are close enough to the general mental image of a coffin that the spell should work, although I can imagine a DM ruling more strictly than that. However, it would be a rare vampire that had only one coffin, and that there was not a nearby graveyard of some sort potentially messing it all up. For example, casting this in Castle Ravenloft would be futile, as not only are there numerous coffins and an entire crypt level filled with them, but merely knowing the direction toward a coffin wouldn't in the slightest tell you how to get there. Are you ruling that it works like "Find the Path"?</p><p></p><p>"Best one I've seen: party can't find a secret door for the life of 'em until someone cast Locate Object and looked for hinges" - For me, this starts to get problematic. The big restriction on the spell is one that is open to interpretation: "if the image is not close enough to the actual object, the spell fails". I can see from the wording a lot of different ways to go with that depending on how you interpret "general", "specific" and "unique". If you want to find a the hinges of a particular door, to me you have to have a mental image that matches the hinges of that door. At the very least, you'll need to guess what the hinge is made of and how it is constructed. For example, I'm guessing when you imagine a hinge right now, it looks something like a modern door hinge. Trouble is, that very likely any secret door in my game is going to be constructed with a post hinge running the length of the door and fitted into brass sockets that support the door at the top and bottom of the frame, which is not at all what you are picturing and so far from what you are picturing that I'd rule the spell wouldn't detect it as matching your mental image even in a general sense. The secret door literally doesn't have hinges like you imagine. If you picture in your head anything that looks like a modern door hinge, you'll very likely get the nearest hinges for something that isn't a secret door or very likely a chest.* And even if you did picture the right sort of secret door, you'd still only know where to search for it, and not how to open it and in any event picturing hinges requires you to know that there is a secret door here in the first place. If your goal is to find secret doors, "Detect Secret Doors" is vastly more powerful in every respect, including the fact that it can detect the latch/trigger mechanism for the door. If you can't do that unaided, merely knowing where the door is doesn't help you, and pretty much this sounds like a DM ruling generously just to get the party unstuck and the game moving again.</p><p></p><p>In short, your used to adjudication on this spell that allows it to substitute as a general spell for several much more specific spells, whereas what I would expect of a DM is to read this and decide that it in fact is a specific spell with a specific purpose - locating objects that look very much like something that the player can clearly describe.</p><p></p><p>*UPDATE: Actually, thinking about it more, you'd most likely detect the latching mechanism on your own travelling spellbook or scroll case, both of which would have a hinge. There are any number of hinge-y things in a typical party's possessions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7643951, member: 4937"] No, I get it now... you are ruling on how the spell works in a way that is vastly more generous than I would. "Not that hard to imagine a gem, is it? Or a coin?" - Sure, but since I've never seen a party that didn't have at least one gem or coin on their person, this would invariably only detect an item already owned by the party. Also gem is far too general for my taste. Jade I would accept. Opal I would accept. Diamond I would accept. Pearl I would accept. Gem doesn't mean anything that can be pictured - it's a disparate class of things united only by value. "Crystal" might detect a lot of different precious stones because at least that's something you can picture, but would miss pearl, opal, or jade. More on that later when you start talking hinges. "Get split up from one of your companions? Cast Locate Object on her shield, it'll at least tell you whether she's close or not." - That would actually work and is pretty cool - and I'll keep that one in mind - but if communications with your companions is the goal there are better spells for arranging that. "Cast Locate Object and look for coffins - they're pretty easy to imagine." - That would probably work as I would accept that most coffins are close enough to the general mental image of a coffin that the spell should work, although I can imagine a DM ruling more strictly than that. However, it would be a rare vampire that had only one coffin, and that there was not a nearby graveyard of some sort potentially messing it all up. For example, casting this in Castle Ravenloft would be futile, as not only are there numerous coffins and an entire crypt level filled with them, but merely knowing the direction toward a coffin wouldn't in the slightest tell you how to get there. Are you ruling that it works like "Find the Path"? "Best one I've seen: party can't find a secret door for the life of 'em until someone cast Locate Object and looked for hinges" - For me, this starts to get problematic. The big restriction on the spell is one that is open to interpretation: "if the image is not close enough to the actual object, the spell fails". I can see from the wording a lot of different ways to go with that depending on how you interpret "general", "specific" and "unique". If you want to find a the hinges of a particular door, to me you have to have a mental image that matches the hinges of that door. At the very least, you'll need to guess what the hinge is made of and how it is constructed. For example, I'm guessing when you imagine a hinge right now, it looks something like a modern door hinge. Trouble is, that very likely any secret door in my game is going to be constructed with a post hinge running the length of the door and fitted into brass sockets that support the door at the top and bottom of the frame, which is not at all what you are picturing and so far from what you are picturing that I'd rule the spell wouldn't detect it as matching your mental image even in a general sense. The secret door literally doesn't have hinges like you imagine. If you picture in your head anything that looks like a modern door hinge, you'll very likely get the nearest hinges for something that isn't a secret door or very likely a chest.* And even if you did picture the right sort of secret door, you'd still only know where to search for it, and not how to open it and in any event picturing hinges requires you to know that there is a secret door here in the first place. If your goal is to find secret doors, "Detect Secret Doors" is vastly more powerful in every respect, including the fact that it can detect the latch/trigger mechanism for the door. If you can't do that unaided, merely knowing where the door is doesn't help you, and pretty much this sounds like a DM ruling generously just to get the party unstuck and the game moving again. In short, your used to adjudication on this spell that allows it to substitute as a general spell for several much more specific spells, whereas what I would expect of a DM is to read this and decide that it in fact is a specific spell with a specific purpose - locating objects that look very much like something that the player can clearly describe. *UPDATE: Actually, thinking about it more, you'd most likely detect the latching mechanism on your own travelling spellbook or scroll case, both of which would have a hinge. There are any number of hinge-y things in a typical party's possessions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What spell have you never seen cast?
Top