Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Roman" data-source="post: 3475806" data-attributes="member: 1845">Of course, but a friendly greeting in one's native tongue has never hurt anybody! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  It is certainly possible to solve the fighter/spellcaster issues the removal of iterative attacks poses either by giving fighters some other bonuses to match the exponential power increases of the spellcasters or to flatten spellcaster power acquisition progression to bring it in line with the fighters. If they pull it off successfully, and they probably, will I will be happy, but so far we just don't know. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I think the skill consolidation they have undertaken, although going a bit too far, is still rather positive on the whole. It is the other skill rules that do not allow for sufficient differentiation and that tie skills closer to levels that I take issue with.</blockquote>