Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cap'n Kobold" data-source="post: 7219569" data-attributes="member: 6802951">That's a good point. Other than major setting-specific races, the required races seem to be covered. What left are people's personal favourites that they'd like to be made official rather than have to use a DM's guild or homebrew version.What would a Dervish-type require? You can make a character on that concept using Fighter, Barbarian, Swashbuckler, possibly Ranger or even Paladin. Likewise Valour Bard makes a pretty good Skald, so what do you see a Skald needing to be able to do that isn't covered?As to the swordsage/mage, there are already 5 or 6 subclasses catering to the &quot;Combining arcane spell casting and melee combat&quot; niche. More if you start looking at including divine magic as well. Add in multiclassing, and its pretty hard to find a concept in the gish category that isn't already covered.What do you think is missing?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cap'n Kobold, post: 7219569, member: 6802951"] That's a good point. Other than major setting-specific races, the required races seem to be covered. What left are people's personal favourites that they'd like to be made official rather than have to use a DM's guild or homebrew version. What would a Dervish-type require? You can make a character on that concept using Fighter, Barbarian, Swashbuckler, possibly Ranger or even Paladin. Likewise Valour Bard makes a pretty good Skald, so what do you see a Skald needing to be able to do that isn't covered? As to the swordsage/mage, there are already 5 or 6 subclasses catering to the "Combining arcane spell casting and melee combat" niche. More if you start looking at including divine magic as well. Add in multiclassing, and its pretty hard to find a concept in the gish category that isn't already covered. What do you think is missing? [/QUOTE]

Verification