Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7043418" data-attributes="member: 996">The DPR focus is also in fighter chassis which has Extra attack &amp; Action Surge, too.&nbsp; The 'depth' issue is a few things... Because there's a dozen or so BM maneuvers* vs hundreds of fighter exploits*.&nbsp; And because CS dice are 1-hr rest recharge (expectation, about every-other encounter), vs exploits being at-will, encounter (recovering about twice as fast) and daily as well as both attack and utility.&nbsp; And because maneuvers are all in essence 'low level' - ie you can choose any of them at 3rd level, none are 'higher level.'So, depth of choice, depth of play, that kind of depth.&nbsp;Sure seemed to, though that was alongside casters with far /less/ depth of choice and the like than in 5e.&nbsp; So that contrast could have something to do with it, too.&nbsp; * isn't 'maneuvers' just a way better name than 'exploits?'&nbsp; I mean, seriously.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7043418, member: 996"] The DPR focus is also in fighter chassis which has Extra attack & Action Surge, too. The 'depth' issue is a few things... Because there's a dozen or so BM maneuvers* vs hundreds of fighter exploits*. And because CS dice are 1-hr rest recharge (expectation, about every-other encounter), vs exploits being at-will, encounter (recovering about twice as fast) and daily as well as both attack and utility. And because maneuvers are all in essence 'low level' - ie you can choose any of them at 3rd level, none are 'higher level.' So, depth of choice, depth of play, that kind of depth. Sure seemed to, though that was alongside casters with far /less/ depth of choice and the like than in 5e. So that contrast could have something to do with it, too. * isn't 'maneuvers' just a way better name than 'exploits?' I mean, seriously. [/QUOTE]

Verification