Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What to do About NAD Deficcency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neuroglyph" data-source="post: 4989790" data-attributes="member: 85633"><p>I think your math is solid, based upon the experiences of the characters in your campaign. For my own campaign I think the "+1 to F/R/W defenses at levels 5, 15, 25" is sufficient.</p><p> </p><p>But looking through the Paragon Tier monsters, alot of the NAD attacks are just encounter powers. That means that your party is going to be subjected to an NAD attack one time per monster during a fight, and the remaining attacks will be against AC.</p><p> </p><p>Obviously, some paragon monsters have NAD attacks on the recharge(5 6), and a few have them as at wills, but that's not common. While I agree that makes them threatening to a group, adding too many modifiers in seems like it would make it too easy to ignore those types of attacks.</p><p> </p><p>I think if you feel the need to house rule the NADs a great deal, it might be due to the monsters you're throwing at the PCs. As DMs we can choose what to hit the PCs with, and you have the choice whether or not to drop a critter that attacks a weak NAD at will. </p><p> </p><p>Personally, I thinkg it's easier to mod a monster and change an "at will" NAD attack to a "recharge X" or "encounter" than adding too many house rules to the characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neuroglyph, post: 4989790, member: 85633"] I think your math is solid, based upon the experiences of the characters in your campaign. For my own campaign I think the "+1 to F/R/W defenses at levels 5, 15, 25" is sufficient. But looking through the Paragon Tier monsters, alot of the NAD attacks are just encounter powers. That means that your party is going to be subjected to an NAD attack one time per monster during a fight, and the remaining attacks will be against AC. Obviously, some paragon monsters have NAD attacks on the recharge(5 6), and a few have them as at wills, but that's not common. While I agree that makes them threatening to a group, adding too many modifiers in seems like it would make it too easy to ignore those types of attacks. I think if you feel the need to house rule the NADs a great deal, it might be due to the monsters you're throwing at the PCs. As DMs we can choose what to hit the PCs with, and you have the choice whether or not to drop a critter that attacks a weak NAD at will. Personally, I thinkg it's easier to mod a monster and change an "at will" NAD attack to a "recharge X" or "encounter" than adding too many house rules to the characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What to do About NAD Deficcency?
Top