Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 9067453" data-attributes="member: 63508">(Points to DMG)Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book.(Points to MM)Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book.(Points to XGTE)Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book.(Points to TCOE)Wait..wait.. their is a wee bit here...<h3>Spells as Natural Hazards.</h3>oh. Magic spells as nature.It is clear that the 5e designers had no interest in wilderness encounters past low levels. They did not build formulas nor provide guidance to make your own higher level wilderness experiences. So the reasonable expectation from the books are low level nonmagical encounters then straight up magic.Sure we can write our own. But 99% of DMs who learn to run D&amp;D wilderness encounter from WOTC or a WOTC-mnded 3PP and aren't nature aficionados isn't going to have the meat to run mid and high level wilderness content that isn't spell based.&nbsp; Who a spell-less ranger written for 5e would need a full wilderness chapter or they would just be the disappointing equivalent of a fighter/rogue with a feat. Hence why the spell-less ranger rules never became official.That's all I'm saying. I mean folks[ATTACH=full]290056[/ATTACH]where's the lie?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 9067453, member: 63508"] (Points to DMG) Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book. (Points to MM) Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book. (Points to XGTE) Mid and high level wilderness content is not in this book. (Points to TCOE) Wait..wait.. their is a wee bit here... [HEADING=2]Spells as Natural Hazards.[/HEADING] oh. Magic spells as nature. It is clear that the 5e designers had no interest in wilderness encounters past low levels. They did not build formulas nor provide guidance to make your own higher level wilderness experiences. So the reasonable expectation from the books are low level nonmagical encounters then straight up magic. Sure we can write our own. But 99% of DMs who learn to run D&D wilderness encounter from WOTC or a WOTC-mnded 3PP and aren't nature aficionados isn't going to have the meat to run mid and high level wilderness content that isn't spell based. Who a spell-less ranger written for 5e would need a full wilderness chapter or they would just be the disappointing equivalent of a fighter/rogue with a feat. Hence why the spell-less ranger rules never became official. That's all I'm saying. I mean folks [ATTACH type="full"]290056[/ATTACH] where's the lie? [/QUOTE]

Verification