Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What variant rules should I add to my new campaign?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7518058" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I haven't actually tried any of these yet, but these are the ones from the DMG I would like to try, in order of decreasing interests:</p><p></p><p>1) <strong>Action Options</strong>: These are IMHO almost a no-brainer additions if you want to increase the tactical aspect of combat encounters.</p><p></p><p>2) <strong>Facing</strong>: Part of me is afraid that this is too fiddly, and it almost certainly requires minis to use these rules consistently. But it definitely increases the tacticalities of combat.</p><p></p><p>3) <strong>Flanking</strong>: For some reasons, the author of the excellent The Monsters Know blog strongly suggests to use the flanking rules, while others hate them. Overall they aren't difficult to use, and they certainly <em>do</em> have tactical consequences on how people play in combat. I expect flanking to generally shorten combat by increasing the average attack success rate of everyone, but let's keep in mind that this includes the monsters. Many characters/monsters might be able to use special abilities that activate on advantage more often. Then how exactly this whole thing will end up I cannot say... it's possible that overall combat even becomes <em>less</em> tactical if everyone is always looking for flanking for cheap advantage and neglects every other option to get the same advantage; but it's also possible that another gaming group will start thinking harder about how to <em>negate</em> the advantage of flanking monsters, thus making the whole game <em>more</em> tactical. I suppose you have to try to see how it works with your players.</p><p></p><p>4) <strong>Hitting Cover</strong> and <strong>Cleaving</strong> are a bit too fiddly for my tastes, but are <em>small</em> rules to add. The second one could actually help offsetting Flanking a little bit if it turns out that hordes of small monsters benefit too much from it.</p><p></p><p>5) <strong>Speed Factor</strong>, honestly I would leave it last... I am somewhat fascinated by this old-style option, but in truth I do not believe that it will change a lot the <em>tactical</em> choices of every player. Most martial players will still focus on their one weapon attack style they're best at and have invested into, there won't be much tactical choice on a round basis IMHO. Spellcasters might be more affected, and sometimes choose a faster lower-level spell over a slower higher-level spell, but that's it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7518058, member: 1465"] I haven't actually tried any of these yet, but these are the ones from the DMG I would like to try, in order of decreasing interests: 1) [B]Action Options[/B]: These are IMHO almost a no-brainer additions if you want to increase the tactical aspect of combat encounters. 2) [B]Facing[/B]: Part of me is afraid that this is too fiddly, and it almost certainly requires minis to use these rules consistently. But it definitely increases the tacticalities of combat. 3) [B]Flanking[/B]: For some reasons, the author of the excellent The Monsters Know blog strongly suggests to use the flanking rules, while others hate them. Overall they aren't difficult to use, and they certainly [I]do[/I] have tactical consequences on how people play in combat. I expect flanking to generally shorten combat by increasing the average attack success rate of everyone, but let's keep in mind that this includes the monsters. Many characters/monsters might be able to use special abilities that activate on advantage more often. Then how exactly this whole thing will end up I cannot say... it's possible that overall combat even becomes [I]less[/I] tactical if everyone is always looking for flanking for cheap advantage and neglects every other option to get the same advantage; but it's also possible that another gaming group will start thinking harder about how to [I]negate[/I] the advantage of flanking monsters, thus making the whole game [I]more[/I] tactical. I suppose you have to try to see how it works with your players. 4) [B]Hitting Cover[/B] and [B]Cleaving[/B] are a bit too fiddly for my tastes, but are [I]small[/I] rules to add. The second one could actually help offsetting Flanking a little bit if it turns out that hordes of small monsters benefit too much from it. 5) [B]Speed Factor[/B], honestly I would leave it last... I am somewhat fascinated by this old-style option, but in truth I do not believe that it will change a lot the [I]tactical[/I] choices of every player. Most martial players will still focus on their one weapon attack style they're best at and have invested into, there won't be much tactical choice on a round basis IMHO. Spellcasters might be more affected, and sometimes choose a faster lower-level spell over a slower higher-level spell, but that's it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What variant rules should I add to my new campaign?
Top