Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 4122626" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Eh, different strokes for different folks I guess...I mean according to this logic, no one anywhere is playing anything but D&D and every other rpg publisher is appaently publishing books for the love of it rather than making a profit. In other words anyone who isn't WotC is just wasting their time. I just don't see it that way. I play a multitude of games and D&D is just one amongst them, with WW actually garnering more of my money than WotC did this past year.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Isn't this the case with any rpg? Again by this logic no one would ever try to break-in with a new game. I think the people at Paizo actually have a strong enough understanding of the fanbase for Pathfinder because it is currently based on a subscription model. They probably,(through this and through the amount purchased in stores), have a pretty good idea how large their fanbase is and apparently believe it is large enough to go with a Pathfinder brand rpg. In the end Paizo is creating a rpg to go with a brand that has been out for over a year and no one, except those employed at Paizo, knows what those numbers really look like. They don't have to be D&D profit numbers...they only have to be Paizo profit numbers.</p><p></p><p>I personally feel WotC didn't give Paizo a choice...they snatched Dungeon and Dragon from them...didn't allow them to compile and publish the Age of Worms adventure path (which may have given them the revenue to wait a little longer), decided to charge $5,000 for a license which, while promised in January, no one still knows when it will be available (or whether it will allow the products Paizo wants to publish under 4.0). I mean really everyone claiming how Paizo fumbled the ball as far as 4e , really needs to look at the plays WotC decided to call throughout the marketing and production of 4e with the 3rd party publishers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 4122626, member: 48965"] Eh, different strokes for different folks I guess...I mean according to this logic, no one anywhere is playing anything but D&D and every other rpg publisher is appaently publishing books for the love of it rather than making a profit. In other words anyone who isn't WotC is just wasting their time. I just don't see it that way. I play a multitude of games and D&D is just one amongst them, with WW actually garnering more of my money than WotC did this past year. Isn't this the case with any rpg? Again by this logic no one would ever try to break-in with a new game. I think the people at Paizo actually have a strong enough understanding of the fanbase for Pathfinder because it is currently based on a subscription model. They probably,(through this and through the amount purchased in stores), have a pretty good idea how large their fanbase is and apparently believe it is large enough to go with a Pathfinder brand rpg. In the end Paizo is creating a rpg to go with a brand that has been out for over a year and no one, except those employed at Paizo, knows what those numbers really look like. They don't have to be D&D profit numbers...they only have to be Paizo profit numbers. I personally feel WotC didn't give Paizo a choice...they snatched Dungeon and Dragon from them...didn't allow them to compile and publish the Age of Worms adventure path (which may have given them the revenue to wait a little longer), decided to charge $5,000 for a license which, while promised in January, no one still knows when it will be available (or whether it will allow the products Paizo wants to publish under 4.0). I mean really everyone claiming how Paizo fumbled the ball as far as 4e , really needs to look at the plays WotC decided to call throughout the marketing and production of 4e with the 3rd party publishers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
Top