Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4125506" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>I think some people are making assumptions that I would be more careful with.</p><p></p><p>1) Paizo is the only one that have their marketing figures. They had an active magazine, and they have an active board. I suspect they even have more sources for information on their customers. Anyway, they have the figures. They are the best suited to make decisions on what to do. If they decide that going with 3.5/3.75/Pathfinder RPG the way they do it, I will assume that they know what they are doing. I will not assume that they are stupid and WotC is the only one in the business knowing what is right or wrong to do. </p><p></p><p>2) Paizo is not WotC. The size and the market they serve is considerably different. And that will not change much. What is required or will work for WotC might not be applicable to Paizo - and vice versa. </p><p></p><p>3) WotC wants to make money. And so does Paizo. Neither of them is in there just for the good of their heart. But behind both businesses, there are people dedicated to the hobby. Never believe anything else. And that means that if the designers of WotC or Paizo are asked by the faceless, in-only-for-the-money-making entities of their corporation, they will come up with their best for the game. And NOTHING less. Saying that what is done "only for the money" discounts this possiblity, and that is plain wrong and insulting. </p><p>People must learn to differentiate between the faceless business identity of a corporation and the people that actually make it up. You can still not like what the people come up with, but that's not for their lack of trying or their will to do their best.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4125506, member: 710"] I think some people are making assumptions that I would be more careful with. 1) Paizo is the only one that have their marketing figures. They had an active magazine, and they have an active board. I suspect they even have more sources for information on their customers. Anyway, they have the figures. They are the best suited to make decisions on what to do. If they decide that going with 3.5/3.75/Pathfinder RPG the way they do it, I will assume that they know what they are doing. I will not assume that they are stupid and WotC is the only one in the business knowing what is right or wrong to do. 2) Paizo is not WotC. The size and the market they serve is considerably different. And that will not change much. What is required or will work for WotC might not be applicable to Paizo - and vice versa. 3) WotC wants to make money. And so does Paizo. Neither of them is in there just for the good of their heart. But behind both businesses, there are people dedicated to the hobby. Never believe anything else. And that means that if the designers of WotC or Paizo are asked by the faceless, in-only-for-the-money-making entities of their corporation, they will come up with their best for the game. And NOTHING less. Saying that what is done "only for the money" discounts this possiblity, and that is plain wrong and insulting. People must learn to differentiate between the faceless business identity of a corporation and the people that actually make it up. You can still not like what the people come up with, but that's not for their lack of trying or their will to do their best. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
Top