Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JediSoth" data-source="post: 4129582" data-attributes="member: 13882"><p>TSR may not have paid attention to market research, but they did do some. I recall filling out a rather lengthy survey in Dragon magazine in regards to design specifics for the forthcoming 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons.</p><p></p><p>I remember it quite vividly 'cause I thought it was cool that they were asking the customers what we wanted to see in a second edition of the game. I thought it was even cooler that the monster manuals were three-ring binders, since that's the selection I checked on that particular question (my opinion of them has since changed, but that's neither here nor there).</p><p></p><p>The way I see it, Paizo's hand was forced by the tardiness of the GSL. From what I've read, they wanted to have it in hand to evaluated (and would most likely have switched over to 4E), but without it and production schedules being what they are, they have to move forward. They can't move forward to 4E without the legal information in the GSL, so they decided to go this route. That doesn't mean that they won't produce adventure paths for 4E in the future, once they get the GSL, but right now, they can't, even if they want to.</p><p></p><p>I can see very clearly the problem with 3rd party companies producing 4E stuff right now (or at least announcing it before the GSL has been released). What if they spend a lot of time and money creating things only to find out what they've created is not allowed under the GSL? The time spent on those projects is now wasted and that takes away from their bottom line. I would hope no company would be foolish enough to do that, but stranger things have happened.* If I was in Paizo's shoes, I certainly wouldn't commit to publishing anything under a license agreement I haven't seen yet. For all they know they GSL contains language that says anything published under it becomes WotC's Intellectual Property.**</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>JediSoth</p><p></p><p>* I come from a background in publishing, so I'm not just talking out of my lower oriface here, I know all about wasted time on project you're ultimately not going to make money on, and it's something management, board members, and financial gurus really frown upon.</p><p></p><p>** I'm not saying that it does, I'm just being hypothetical.</p><p></p><p>*** It's sad I feel the need to explain comments in footnotes, but after having people jump down my throat for minor 4E criticisms, I feel it's necessary to cover all my bases.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JediSoth, post: 4129582, member: 13882"] TSR may not have paid attention to market research, but they did do some. I recall filling out a rather lengthy survey in Dragon magazine in regards to design specifics for the forthcoming 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons and Dragons. I remember it quite vividly 'cause I thought it was cool that they were asking the customers what we wanted to see in a second edition of the game. I thought it was even cooler that the monster manuals were three-ring binders, since that's the selection I checked on that particular question (my opinion of them has since changed, but that's neither here nor there). The way I see it, Paizo's hand was forced by the tardiness of the GSL. From what I've read, they wanted to have it in hand to evaluated (and would most likely have switched over to 4E), but without it and production schedules being what they are, they have to move forward. They can't move forward to 4E without the legal information in the GSL, so they decided to go this route. That doesn't mean that they won't produce adventure paths for 4E in the future, once they get the GSL, but right now, they can't, even if they want to. I can see very clearly the problem with 3rd party companies producing 4E stuff right now (or at least announcing it before the GSL has been released). What if they spend a lot of time and money creating things only to find out what they've created is not allowed under the GSL? The time spent on those projects is now wasted and that takes away from their bottom line. I would hope no company would be foolish enough to do that, but stranger things have happened.* If I was in Paizo's shoes, I certainly wouldn't commit to publishing anything under a license agreement I haven't seen yet. For all they know they GSL contains language that says anything published under it becomes WotC's Intellectual Property.** JediSoth * I come from a background in publishing, so I'm not just talking out of my lower oriface here, I know all about wasted time on project you're ultimately not going to make money on, and it's something management, board members, and financial gurus really frown upon. ** I'm not saying that it does, I'm just being hypothetical. *** It's sad I feel the need to explain comments in footnotes, but after having people jump down my throat for minor 4E criticisms, I feel it's necessary to cover all my bases. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
Top