Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bmcdaniel" data-source="post: 4135371" data-attributes="member: 1772"><p>While it is theoretically possible that some marketing research regarding D&D was not part of WOTC's acquisition of TSR, such an event is highly unlikely for two reasons.</p><p></p><p>1. Regarding a legal exclusion: there would be no business purpose in excluding market research regarding an asset that was delivered (i.e. the D&D brand). Any such exclusion would (by necessity) have required disclosure in the acquisition agreement (the nature of acquisitions is that all assets are included unless specifically excluded), and Dancey would be aware of it. I think we can assume in good faith that Dancey would not have expressed surprise at the lack of market research if he was aware that the acquisition agreement excluded market research.</p><p></p><p>2. Regarding extra-legal destruction: it is practically impossible to destroy all evidence of business records like market research. Expenditures for market research will show up in the accounting records; market plans will incorporate references to the research conclusions; the research will be discussed in board minutes; etc. Moreover, continuing personnel would remember the existence of market research. If an employee tried to destroy an asset like market research and the destruction was discovered, both TSR and the employee would be subject to liability (including return of the purchase price of the acquisition) and possibly criminal prosecution (unlikely as a factual matter, but possible). Its hard to imagine why anyone would risk this, especially because the most spiteful people (the TSR shareholders) have the most to lose; regular employees would just transition from TSR to WOTC.</p><p></p><p>For what it is worth, I am a lawyer who routinely is involved with the acquisition of businesses (moreso five years ago than today, but the principles remain the same).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bmcdaniel, post: 4135371, member: 1772"] While it is theoretically possible that some marketing research regarding D&D was not part of WOTC's acquisition of TSR, such an event is highly unlikely for two reasons. 1. Regarding a legal exclusion: there would be no business purpose in excluding market research regarding an asset that was delivered (i.e. the D&D brand). Any such exclusion would (by necessity) have required disclosure in the acquisition agreement (the nature of acquisitions is that all assets are included unless specifically excluded), and Dancey would be aware of it. I think we can assume in good faith that Dancey would not have expressed surprise at the lack of market research if he was aware that the acquisition agreement excluded market research. 2. Regarding extra-legal destruction: it is practically impossible to destroy all evidence of business records like market research. Expenditures for market research will show up in the accounting records; market plans will incorporate references to the research conclusions; the research will be discussed in board minutes; etc. Moreover, continuing personnel would remember the existence of market research. If an employee tried to destroy an asset like market research and the destruction was discovered, both TSR and the employee would be subject to liability (including return of the purchase price of the acquisition) and possibly criminal prosecution (unlikely as a factual matter, but possible). Its hard to imagine why anyone would risk this, especially because the most spiteful people (the TSR shareholders) have the most to lose; regular employees would just transition from TSR to WOTC. For what it is worth, I am a lawyer who routinely is involved with the acquisition of businesses (moreso five years ago than today, but the principles remain the same). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What was Paizo thinking? 3.75 the 4E clone?
Top