Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What we've been looking at in software
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dvvega" data-source="post: 411205" data-attributes="member: 524"><p>First off, thank you Andy (he of the vital internship that does the work for the great management).</p><p></p><p>This thread has been most helpful in clearing up a couple of questions I posted on the boards about a fortnight ago.</p><p></p><p>However one thing still remains to be answered ...</p><p></p><p>I understand the OGL, and what it is trying to accomplish, however the wording of the "interaction" clause is the one I'm most interested in.</p><p></p><p>Yes, they want to stop people developing computer games based on d20, and this is 100% understandable. However, the whole thing about interaction ... I'm a DM, and I use my computer to run my game ... as such I like the machine to take care of a lot of grunt work ... </p><p></p><p>... now if it was to automatically roll attack rolls for my monsters, compare against a PCs AC and then roll damage, it breaks the interaction clause.</p><p></p><p>... if I roll my own dice and input the results into the machine, it still breaks the interaction clause (since it's working things out via human input).</p><p></p><p>Is the spirit of the OGL just about computer games? Or will it be left as is and essentially make anything actually useful like a combat organiser not allowed to be shared amongst fellow gamers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dvvega, post: 411205, member: 524"] First off, thank you Andy (he of the vital internship that does the work for the great management). This thread has been most helpful in clearing up a couple of questions I posted on the boards about a fortnight ago. However one thing still remains to be answered ... I understand the OGL, and what it is trying to accomplish, however the wording of the "interaction" clause is the one I'm most interested in. Yes, they want to stop people developing computer games based on d20, and this is 100% understandable. However, the whole thing about interaction ... I'm a DM, and I use my computer to run my game ... as such I like the machine to take care of a lot of grunt work ... ... now if it was to automatically roll attack rolls for my monsters, compare against a PCs AC and then roll damage, it breaks the interaction clause. ... if I roll my own dice and input the results into the machine, it still breaks the interaction clause (since it's working things out via human input). Is the spirit of the OGL just about computer games? Or will it be left as is and essentially make anything actually useful like a combat organiser not allowed to be shared amongst fellow gamers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What we've been looking at in software
Top