Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 1065840" data-attributes="member: 2067">Sounds WAAAAAY too purchase-intsensive to me. Heck, even WotC is presenting campaign settings as DM/Player/Monster book all in one.I've loved the campaign settings I've baught. And Scarred Lands having a monster book and a magic book first actually worked to it's tremendous advantage (people had an idea of what the setting was like before they had to shell out for the book -- mad props!).Heck, I even liked the Ravenloft 3e setting....tasty....and it was done pretty much how you specified (at first, anyway).In the extreme unlikely eventuallity of any of my settings being published, I'd certainly try to do one book instead of three....that's just overkill. And if it was successful, maybe specific region books (like EVERYONE does, anyway!)Meh. To each their own though. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 1065840, member: 2067"] Sounds WAAAAAY too purchase-intsensive to me. Heck, even WotC is presenting campaign settings as DM/Player/Monster book all in one. I've loved the campaign settings I've baught. And Scarred Lands having a monster book and a magic book first actually worked to it's tremendous advantage (people had an idea of what the setting was like before they had to shell out for the book -- mad props!). Heck, I even liked the Ravenloft 3e setting....tasty....and it was done pretty much how you specified (at first, anyway). In the extreme unlikely eventuallity of any of my settings being published, I'd certainly try to do one book instead of three....that's just overkill. And if it was successful, maybe specific region books (like EVERYONE does, anyway!) Meh. To each their own though. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification