Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 8641608" data-attributes="member: 63508">My preference of Bard would have been a non-caster rogue type with &quot;Bardic Points&quot; that could be used for inspiration, music effects, and magic via the Magic of Music.The funny thing is 5e kept a LOT of 4e-isms. It just renamed a bunch of them. So much that it really feels that 4e was more a right place wrong time deal or &quot;delay launch 8-9 months and 4e would be 5e&quot; deal.---But back to the main discussion. 5e could have been a very basic base with edition based modules you stacked on. Instead it's a 3e-ish edition with 4e-ism panted up like 1e and 2e. Strixhaven got mixed reviews because 5e's based wasn't modular for the originally planned ideas and got stuck going hard on a secondary one. I think 5e is at the point where the developer wished 5e was built to be more modular if you look at the last few releases.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 8641608, member: 63508"] My preference of Bard would have been a non-caster rogue type with "Bardic Points" that could be used for inspiration, music effects, and magic via the Magic of Music. The funny thing is 5e kept a LOT of 4e-isms. It just renamed a bunch of them. So much that it really feels that 4e was more a right place wrong time deal or "delay launch 8-9 months and 4e would be 5e" deal. --- But back to the main discussion. 5e could have been a very basic base with edition based modules you stacked on. Instead it's a 3e-ish edition with 4e-ism panted up like 1e and 2e. Strixhaven got mixed reviews because 5e's based wasn't modular for the originally planned ideas and got stuck going hard on a secondary one. I think 5e is at the point where the developer wished 5e was built to be more modular if you look at the last few releases. [/QUOTE]

Verification