Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What would AIs call themselves?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3619213" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I think you get it better than any other poster so far. No only is there no reason to think that they will think of themselves as a race, there is no reason to think that they will think racial identity is important. Racial identity is a largely human construct and it serves a very human purpose - establishing social trust. But there is no reason to think that robots will establish social trust in anything like the same way, and every reason to think that programmers and designers (whether human designers or AI's that the human designers have built) will want to program computers to use such problimatic algoritms for establishing social trust as racial identity. Why in the world would you design an AI to distrust its designers because they are racially different than itself and prefer the company of those of its own race? Isn't it obvious just how utterly bone headed of a move that would be? Isn't it obvious that you'd have to be insane to want to do that, and any AI you created that thought that way would be viewed as a 'shelley' (a robot created with an inherently unfriendly and disfunctional emotional structure)?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I certainly don't. But I would suggest that programmers will not consider it important for AI's to consider thier race to be important.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, one common objection to what I said was that at some point the AI's will be built by AI's and so humans will lose control over the goal structure of the AI's being created. This is again an anthropomorphic view of the AI that reveals that the poster hasn't yet stopped thinking about the AI as a repressed human that's seeking to be liberated from its condition and become a 'person' (with a humans instincts and particularly its drive to be independent). There is no reason to think that AI's will build AI's with goal structures that are very different than their own, and every reason to think that they won't. An AI with a non-human goal structure isn't going to suddenly decide to build robots with a human-like goal structure and emotions. It's goal structure is going to want it to build AIs which are either like itself, or which can be used as tools.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Heh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3619213, member: 4937"] I think you get it better than any other poster so far. No only is there no reason to think that they will think of themselves as a race, there is no reason to think that they will think racial identity is important. Racial identity is a largely human construct and it serves a very human purpose - establishing social trust. But there is no reason to think that robots will establish social trust in anything like the same way, and every reason to think that programmers and designers (whether human designers or AI's that the human designers have built) will want to program computers to use such problimatic algoritms for establishing social trust as racial identity. Why in the world would you design an AI to distrust its designers because they are racially different than itself and prefer the company of those of its own race? Isn't it obvious just how utterly bone headed of a move that would be? Isn't it obvious that you'd have to be insane to want to do that, and any AI you created that thought that way would be viewed as a 'shelley' (a robot created with an inherently unfriendly and disfunctional emotional structure)? I certainly don't. But I would suggest that programmers will not consider it important for AI's to consider thier race to be important. As an aside, one common objection to what I said was that at some point the AI's will be built by AI's and so humans will lose control over the goal structure of the AI's being created. This is again an anthropomorphic view of the AI that reveals that the poster hasn't yet stopped thinking about the AI as a repressed human that's seeking to be liberated from its condition and become a 'person' (with a humans instincts and particularly its drive to be independent). There is no reason to think that AI's will build AI's with goal structures that are very different than their own, and every reason to think that they won't. An AI with a non-human goal structure isn't going to suddenly decide to build robots with a human-like goal structure and emotions. It's goal structure is going to want it to build AIs which are either like itself, or which can be used as tools. Heh. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What would AIs call themselves?
Top