Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What would casting Grease on a swarm do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2651665" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It's not all assumptions as you state.</p><p></p><p>"Swarms of nonflying creatures include many more creatures than could normally fit in a 10-foot square based on their normal space, because creatures in a swarm are packed tightly together and generally <strong>crawl over each other</strong> and their prey when moving or attacking."</p><p></p><p>"A grease spell <strong>covers a solid surface</strong> with a layer of slippery grease. Any creature <strong>in the area</strong> when the spell is cast must make a successful Reflex save or fall."</p><p></p><p>Since Grease does not affect creatures directly, it affects the surface creatures are on, and since swarms "crawl over each other", my interpretation is just as much RAW as yours.</p><p></p><p>Grease does not make a surface frictionless, it makes it slick. Since we have NO rules on what this means for creatures on top of creatures on top of creatures, your interpretation is just as much of an assumption as mine is.</p><p></p><p>Mine just happens to match common sense and game designer intent more than yours. The game designers did not want swarms to be heavily affected by effects that do not affect the entire swarm.</p><p></p><p>"A swarm is immune to any spell or effect that targets a specific number of creatures (including single-target spells such as disintegrate)"</p><p></p><p>"immune to weapon damage"</p><p></p><p>"cannot be tripped"</p><p></p><p>"cannot be grappled"</p><p></p><p>"cannot be bullrushed"</p><p></p><p>RAW more closesly matches my interpretation. The onus is on you to illustrate that a swarm is not immune to a spell that does not directly affect creatures and does not directly touch the entire swarm.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And, let's take an example out of a game.</p><p></p><p>A PC is covered in Centipedes.</p><p></p><p>His ally PC casts Grease.</p><p></p><p>Suddenly, the thousands of Centipedes that are swarming all over that PC, are in his hair, his clothes, etc., all "fall down" because some of the Centipedes on the floor around him are suddenly on a slick surface.</p><p></p><p>That is blatantly obsurd and nonsensical.</p><p></p><p>This is a case of DM adjudication as opposed to straight RAW. Personally, I want my DM to make a reasonable one.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, I can understand a DM making a ruling that the Grease slows up movement or something. But beyond that, it is taking one RAW interpretation to a nonsensical extreme.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2651665, member: 2011"] It's not all assumptions as you state. "Swarms of nonflying creatures include many more creatures than could normally fit in a 10-foot square based on their normal space, because creatures in a swarm are packed tightly together and generally [b]crawl over each other[/b] and their prey when moving or attacking." "A grease spell [b]covers a solid surface[/b] with a layer of slippery grease. Any creature [b]in the area[/b] when the spell is cast must make a successful Reflex save or fall." Since Grease does not affect creatures directly, it affects the surface creatures are on, and since swarms "crawl over each other", my interpretation is just as much RAW as yours. Grease does not make a surface frictionless, it makes it slick. Since we have NO rules on what this means for creatures on top of creatures on top of creatures, your interpretation is just as much of an assumption as mine is. Mine just happens to match common sense and game designer intent more than yours. The game designers did not want swarms to be heavily affected by effects that do not affect the entire swarm. "A swarm is immune to any spell or effect that targets a specific number of creatures (including single-target spells such as disintegrate)" "immune to weapon damage" "cannot be tripped" "cannot be grappled" "cannot be bullrushed" RAW more closesly matches my interpretation. The onus is on you to illustrate that a swarm is not immune to a spell that does not directly affect creatures and does not directly touch the entire swarm. And, let's take an example out of a game. A PC is covered in Centipedes. His ally PC casts Grease. Suddenly, the thousands of Centipedes that are swarming all over that PC, are in his hair, his clothes, etc., all "fall down" because some of the Centipedes on the floor around him are suddenly on a slick surface. That is blatantly obsurd and nonsensical. This is a case of DM adjudication as opposed to straight RAW. Personally, I want my DM to make a reasonable one. Now, I can understand a DM making a ruling that the Grease slows up movement or something. But beyond that, it is taking one RAW interpretation to a nonsensical extreme. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What would casting Grease on a swarm do?
Top