Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What would you have had them do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 4688030" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>I'm solidly in the C, D or E range, personally.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I had very few issues with 3.5, and would have been content with continuing the game's production.</p><p></p><p>However, I understand the RPG business model pretty well, so I can understand the financial need for a new edition. Options D & E are pretty interchangeable in my eye- I don't think 3.75Ed vs 4Ed as a name only makes much of a difference. Even "3.5 Revised" would have worked.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah- I would have stuck with the solid foundations of the 3.5 edition, and tweaked what really needed tweaking. While there are many opinions of what those things were, certain topics kept cropping up more than others- polymorph rules, clunky rules and unclear/contradictory wordings on things like grapple or natural weapons, or even some of the mechanical refinements made by 3PP like Green Ronin, Malhavoc and so forth.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll echo your caveat- I have no love for 4Ed- but I think its a good FRPG. Its just not my flavor of D&D.</p><p></p><p>My interpretation of what I've seen and read leads me to believe WotC's claims that 4Ed is selling like gangbusters. I see it flying off the shelves at my LGSs all the time.</p><p></p><p>However, I also have no reason to doubt the data from a variety of polls I've seen here and elsewhere- namely that 4Ed does <em>much</em> better with those who are new to D&D or RPGs in general than with the game's installed base.</p><p></p><p>For example, a recent poll here showed that among those who disliked the game, slightly less than half of those responding changed their opinions from positive to negative after experiencing the game in some way, while less than 6% of those who like 4Ed changed their opinions from negative to positive. <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/251283-d-d-4th-edition-change-mind-5.html" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/251283-d-d-4th-edition-change-mind-5.html</a></p><p></p><p>This could be indicative that those big sales numbers are in no small part due to new blood as opposed to converting the D&D vets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 4688030, member: 19675"] I'm solidly in the C, D or E range, personally. Personally, I had very few issues with 3.5, and would have been content with continuing the game's production. However, I understand the RPG business model pretty well, so I can understand the financial need for a new edition. Options D & E are pretty interchangeable in my eye- I don't think 3.75Ed vs 4Ed as a name only makes much of a difference. Even "3.5 Revised" would have worked. So, yeah- I would have stuck with the solid foundations of the 3.5 edition, and tweaked what really needed tweaking. While there are many opinions of what those things were, certain topics kept cropping up more than others- polymorph rules, clunky rules and unclear/contradictory wordings on things like grapple or natural weapons, or even some of the mechanical refinements made by 3PP like Green Ronin, Malhavoc and so forth. I'll echo your caveat- I have no love for 4Ed- but I think its a good FRPG. Its just not my flavor of D&D. My interpretation of what I've seen and read leads me to believe WotC's claims that 4Ed is selling like gangbusters. I see it flying off the shelves at my LGSs all the time. However, I also have no reason to doubt the data from a variety of polls I've seen here and elsewhere- namely that 4Ed does [I]much[/I] better with those who are new to D&D or RPGs in general than with the game's installed base. For example, a recent poll here showed that among those who disliked the game, slightly less than half of those responding changed their opinions from positive to negative after experiencing the game in some way, while less than 6% of those who like 4Ed changed their opinions from negative to positive. [url]http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/251283-d-d-4th-edition-change-mind-5.html[/url] This could be indicative that those big sales numbers are in no small part due to new blood as opposed to converting the D&D vets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What would you have had them do?
Top