Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
What would you like 4E to look like.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xyanthon" data-source="post: 3322751" data-attributes="member: 9181"><p>I’m an avowed 1e fan but I must admit that I wouldn’t expect or want 4e to be 1e in different packaging. After all, I’ve still got all of the books from the previous editions and they still play as good now as they did then. Also OSRIC is making new 1e material possible and I like that. So the whole return to an “official” 1e compatible system isn’t something I need or want. </p><p></p><p>What I’d like to see is a change. Something recognizable enough to be D&D but going on a little different track. I like the idea of having 3 core classes (a fighting man, a skill oriented type, and a magically attuned type). I’d like to see these 3 classes be able to be tuned into whatever concept is desired through a series of skills and feats. I’d still keep the levels, d20 unified XP progression, progressive armor class, etc. I’d keep much of the d20isms but simplify them. I’d make AoO and the like optional and try to streamline combat more. I really hated the idea of integrating minis into the game at first, but I must admit that I like the concept more now. I even like the Fantastic Location series and would like to see more of that type of thing. I’d probably strip out any setting in the core rules (including Greyhawk) and leave that for supplements. </p><p></p><p>I know as an old school fan that a lot of this may seem to be heresy. I have thought about it for a while and decided that 1e does 1e better than anything else and I don’t need WotC to get in on the mix and add updated art, spells, etc to a system I already play and love. I think the old school publishers out there such as Necromancer, Goodman, the OSRIC publishers like XRP, Ronin Arts, etc do a much better job of producing material that is in line with those systems than WotC could anyway. Now, I’m not saying that it wouldn’t be cool if WotC opened things up a bit more and gave the official blessing so that companies could once again produce new material for 1e, OD&D, BECMI, and the rest. I really wish they would. However, I’d like to see WotC look at some of the other systems out there like C&C and True 20 and maybe adapt some of those ideas into making 4e a much faster and more easily tailored system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xyanthon, post: 3322751, member: 9181"] I’m an avowed 1e fan but I must admit that I wouldn’t expect or want 4e to be 1e in different packaging. After all, I’ve still got all of the books from the previous editions and they still play as good now as they did then. Also OSRIC is making new 1e material possible and I like that. So the whole return to an “official” 1e compatible system isn’t something I need or want. What I’d like to see is a change. Something recognizable enough to be D&D but going on a little different track. I like the idea of having 3 core classes (a fighting man, a skill oriented type, and a magically attuned type). I’d like to see these 3 classes be able to be tuned into whatever concept is desired through a series of skills and feats. I’d still keep the levels, d20 unified XP progression, progressive armor class, etc. I’d keep much of the d20isms but simplify them. I’d make AoO and the like optional and try to streamline combat more. I really hated the idea of integrating minis into the game at first, but I must admit that I like the concept more now. I even like the Fantastic Location series and would like to see more of that type of thing. I’d probably strip out any setting in the core rules (including Greyhawk) and leave that for supplements. I know as an old school fan that a lot of this may seem to be heresy. I have thought about it for a while and decided that 1e does 1e better than anything else and I don’t need WotC to get in on the mix and add updated art, spells, etc to a system I already play and love. I think the old school publishers out there such as Necromancer, Goodman, the OSRIC publishers like XRP, Ronin Arts, etc do a much better job of producing material that is in line with those systems than WotC could anyway. Now, I’m not saying that it wouldn’t be cool if WotC opened things up a bit more and gave the official blessing so that companies could once again produce new material for 1e, OD&D, BECMI, and the rest. I really wish they would. However, I’d like to see WotC look at some of the other systems out there like C&C and True 20 and maybe adapt some of those ideas into making 4e a much faster and more easily tailored system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
What would you like 4E to look like.
Top