Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Haltherrion" data-source="post: 2809333" data-attributes="member: 18253">I'd like to see three things:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The User Galleries working again</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">More work on the product ratings page. (just checked now and not sure the averate rating feature is working.) It would be really nice to see what fellow Enworlders thought of various products, the WOTC stuff but especially the other publishers.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul"> larger user avatars. 64x64 is too tiny. People already have much larger banners in their footers and the standard avatars are often larger.</li>
</ul>To extend the second point, I think Amazon creates a lot of sales by making it easy to gather and display ratings from lots of users for various products. Helps people go from &quot;maybe I should buy this&quot; to &quot;yep, looks good, I'll buy.&quot; Enworld users should be able to get lots of value from it and it should generate traffic for the Enworld store and help support the site.To be useful, you'd like something that quickly and gracefully allowed folks to enter ratings (maybe a sheet with many products on it at once and something like amazon's very quick rating update that you see on their &quot;your store&quot; page.) Would be even cooler to have break-out categories like &quot;utility for a ref&quot;, &quot;utility for a player&quot;, &quot;illustration quality&quot;, etc in addition to overall rating. When reporting ratings it is important for readers to be able to determine how many users the ratings is based on.I've purchased very few non-WOTC items but it is more out of difficulty of browsing the material than a dislike of those venues. Would really like an easier way to find the gems. The reviews are useful but ratings would be much better as a first step to cull things down a bit.You could&nbsp; encourage people to rate items by tallying ratings in addition to postings (people are surprisingly responsive to such things&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; )</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Haltherrion, post: 2809333, member: 18253"] I'd like to see three things: [list] [*]The User Galleries working again [*]More work on the product ratings page. (just checked now and not sure the averate rating feature is working.) It would be really nice to see what fellow Enworlders thought of various products, the WOTC stuff but especially the other publishers. [*] larger user avatars. 64x64 is too tiny. People already have much larger banners in their footers and the standard avatars are often larger.[/list] To extend the second point, I think Amazon creates a lot of sales by making it easy to gather and display ratings from lots of users for various products. Helps people go from "maybe I should buy this" to "yep, looks good, I'll buy." Enworld users should be able to get lots of value from it and it should generate traffic for the Enworld store and help support the site. To be useful, you'd like something that quickly and gracefully allowed folks to enter ratings (maybe a sheet with many products on it at once and something like amazon's very quick rating update that you see on their "your store" page.) Would be even cooler to have break-out categories like "utility for a ref", "utility for a player", "illustration quality", etc in addition to overall rating. When reporting ratings it is important for readers to be able to determine how many users the ratings is based on. I've purchased very few non-WOTC items but it is more out of difficulty of browsing the material than a dislike of those venues. Would really like an easier way to find the gems. The reviews are useful but ratings would be much better as a first step to cull things down a bit. You could encourage people to rate items by tallying ratings in addition to postings (people are surprisingly responsive to such things ;) ) [/QUOTE]

Verification