Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Would You Put In a 5E Red Box?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="am181d" data-source="post: 6240282" data-attributes="member: 3576"><p>I don't understand this statement. Clearly, an introductory game is a success (and therefore worth making) if it is:</p><p>A) broadly accessible</p><p>B) enjoyable</p><p>C) encourages purchasers to seek out more product of this type</p><p></p><p>There's nothing about these requirements that demands that the introductory version of the game cover EVERY aspect of game play or be entirely self-contained. (Indeed, it would be a fairly poor introductory product if no one who bought it ever felt the need to buy anything else.) </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>It's not arbitrary. The core of the role-playing experience is what happens at the table on game day. That's a very clear and considered dividing line. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who are you afraid we're excluding? The player who doesn't like playing the game, but loves creating characters? The DM who doesn't like running the game, but loves crafting adventures? I'm not convinced that this is a significant or sustainable portion of the market.</p><p></p><p>For people who love playing the game, but want to create their own characters, there's a book for them to buy. For people who love running the game, and want to create their own adventures, there's a book for them to buy. </p><p></p><p>For people who REALLY want to start out creating characters or creating their own adventures, they can just skip the "Adventure Box" series entirely and go straight to the core books. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but it's an extra level of complexity that prospective role-players have to take care of before they can get to the heart of the gaming experience: actually sitting at a table and playing the game. </p><p></p><p>That's the point at which they'll determine if they like RPGs or not. If they don't like that experience, your intro product has failed, regardless of what else you provide in it. If they like role-playing, then you can provide them next steps.</p><p></p><p>The goal is to get a product into the hands of as many customers as possible that will help them answer the question "Will I enjoy tabletop RPGs."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The goal of an intro box is not to appeal to some Platonic ideal of what a role-playing game should be. It's to find new gamers.</p><p></p><p>I mean, it's just common sense: If you have a friend who thinks maybe they MIGHT be interested in playing an RPG, what do you do? You invite them to a session, you give them a character to play for the afternoon, and you let them see if they enjoy it or not. This is that experience, in a box.</p><p></p><p>(But with an adventure that covers many sessions, and rules for leveling up -- per the original specifications.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="am181d, post: 6240282, member: 3576"] I don't understand this statement. Clearly, an introductory game is a success (and therefore worth making) if it is: A) broadly accessible B) enjoyable C) encourages purchasers to seek out more product of this type There's nothing about these requirements that demands that the introductory version of the game cover EVERY aspect of game play or be entirely self-contained. (Indeed, it would be a fairly poor introductory product if no one who bought it ever felt the need to buy anything else.) It's not arbitrary. The core of the role-playing experience is what happens at the table on game day. That's a very clear and considered dividing line. Who are you afraid we're excluding? The player who doesn't like playing the game, but loves creating characters? The DM who doesn't like running the game, but loves crafting adventures? I'm not convinced that this is a significant or sustainable portion of the market. For people who love playing the game, but want to create their own characters, there's a book for them to buy. For people who love running the game, and want to create their own adventures, there's a book for them to buy. For people who REALLY want to start out creating characters or creating their own adventures, they can just skip the "Adventure Box" series entirely and go straight to the core books. Sure, but it's an extra level of complexity that prospective role-players have to take care of before they can get to the heart of the gaming experience: actually sitting at a table and playing the game. That's the point at which they'll determine if they like RPGs or not. If they don't like that experience, your intro product has failed, regardless of what else you provide in it. If they like role-playing, then you can provide them next steps. The goal is to get a product into the hands of as many customers as possible that will help them answer the question "Will I enjoy tabletop RPGs." The goal of an intro box is not to appeal to some Platonic ideal of what a role-playing game should be. It's to find new gamers. I mean, it's just common sense: If you have a friend who thinks maybe they MIGHT be interested in playing an RPG, what do you do? You invite them to a session, you give them a character to play for the afternoon, and you let them see if they enjoy it or not. This is that experience, in a box. (But with an adventure that covers many sessions, and rules for leveling up -- per the original specifications.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What Would You Put In a 5E Red Box?
Top