Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 7598194" data-attributes="member: 6689464">I will support PF2. As long as it does sorcerers justice -I mean if my sorceress can still cast spells while bound and gagged- I expect to at least get the core book and the bestiary. I could even get that book with houserules and tinkering guidelines. I can handle a lot of stuff, I don't care too much for complexity, and I could live without organic multiclassing. But as long as I get that minimum out of a game I up to it. Oh wait as of the playtest socerers can no longer do that, so I'm in wait and see.Back when the game first launched I thought a sorlock could be a fun character to play, a could character that could remain magical all day long -I never looked at it from a dps angle, though - I just couldn't see myself playing any of the warlock patrons available at the time. Sadly by the time Xanathars arrived, no DM would even let me state my case. Damn DPS obsessed Powergamers....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 7598194, member: 6689464"] I will support PF2. As long as it does sorcerers justice -I mean if my sorceress can still cast spells while bound and gagged- I expect to at least get the core book and the bestiary. I could even get that book with houserules and tinkering guidelines. I can handle a lot of stuff, I don't care too much for complexity, and I could live without organic multiclassing. But as long as I get that minimum out of a game I up to it. Oh wait as of the playtest socerers can no longer do that, so I'm in wait and see. Back when the game first launched I thought a sorlock could be a fun character to play, a could character that could remain magical all day long -I never looked at it from a dps angle, though - I just couldn't see myself playing any of the warlock patrons available at the time. Sadly by the time Xanathars arrived, no DM would even let me state my case. Damn DPS obsessed Powergamers.... [/QUOTE]

Verification