nikolai
First Post
I bought the 30th anniversary issue of Dragon recently, mostly because of nostalgia. The history of D&D article was nice; but I was shocked that there was almost nothing worth using in my game in the rest of the magazine. What happened?
There seemed like an awful lot of padding, and even when there was a good idea behind the article, the excecution seemed pretty poor. I realise that a big chunk of the magazine was taken up with the 30th anniversary stuff, but there seemed to be very little to the rest of the magazine. Is this issue representative of the current quality of Dragon? Maybe they should try to break away from the "themed issue" idea, so they don't have to focus on a narrow topic in each issue.
There seemed like an awful lot of padding, and even when there was a good idea behind the article, the excecution seemed pretty poor. I realise that a big chunk of the magazine was taken up with the 30th anniversary stuff, but there seemed to be very little to the rest of the magazine. Is this issue representative of the current quality of Dragon? Maybe they should try to break away from the "themed issue" idea, so they don't have to focus on a narrow topic in each issue.