Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's a "unique being" for purposes of Gate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 1972441" data-attributes="member: 23094"><p>I think the wording of the spell - specifically, the way the two potential groups of targets are joined - speaks against the majority here.</p><p></p><p>There are two potential target groups:</p><p></p><p>"[By naming] a particular being or kind of being"</p><p></p><p>-- and --</p><p></p><p>"Deities and unique beings"</p><p></p><p>Members of the first group are brought through whether or not they are willing - "pull the subject through, willing or unwilling" - while the second are under no such compulsion - "may choose to do so of their own accord."</p><p></p><p>Now, given that, what are the ramifications of ruling that any creature with a name qualifies as a "unique being" and therefore can choose whether or not to enter?</p><p></p><p>Well, first off, everything has a name, even if you don't know it. So, if I cast the Gate spell and said, "Give me a Balor," then Grim'zk the Undying (an MM standard Balor) might get randomly picked and brought through even against his will, while if I cast the spell asking for Grim'zk the Undying <em>specifically</em>, he'd have a choice.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I'd say that goes against the entire mythos of calling demons - the better you know your target (like, knowing its name), the easier it is to call.</p><p></p><p>Also, it doesn't really make sense that a more specifically targeted application of a spell would be <em>weaker</em> than a very specific application.</p><p></p><p>Second, you've set up an odd situation whereby, so long as I can get a category close enough without naming something specifically, I can pull that something in without problem. Sure, you can't cast the spell, call for Asmodeus specifically, and always expect him to show up, but if I allow the spell to pick "a general of Hell," well then, I figure I've got a 1 / 9 chance of getting him, whether he wants it or not!</p><p></p><p>No, I think the answer lies in the two groupings: succinctly, "deities and like beings" and "everyone else."</p><p></p><p>Asmodeus, as a General of Hell, is a "deity or like being." Grim'zk the Undying is powerful, but he's still "everyone else." Even Grim'zk's older brother, Hrazh-kul the We-Aren't-Joking-He-Really-Isn't-Ever-Going-To-Die (an MM standard Balor with 20 levels in Sorceror, 10 in Archmage, and 5 in Weapon Master), though more powerful than his brother, is still "everyone else." At some point, he may cross the line from "everyone else" to "deity or like being," but having a name or class levels *ain't* the spot that marks that line.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 1972441, member: 23094"] I think the wording of the spell - specifically, the way the two potential groups of targets are joined - speaks against the majority here. There are two potential target groups: "[By naming] a particular being or kind of being" -- and -- "Deities and unique beings" Members of the first group are brought through whether or not they are willing - "pull the subject through, willing or unwilling" - while the second are under no such compulsion - "may choose to do so of their own accord." Now, given that, what are the ramifications of ruling that any creature with a name qualifies as a "unique being" and therefore can choose whether or not to enter? Well, first off, everything has a name, even if you don't know it. So, if I cast the Gate spell and said, "Give me a Balor," then Grim'zk the Undying (an MM standard Balor) might get randomly picked and brought through even against his will, while if I cast the spell asking for Grim'zk the Undying [i]specifically[/i], he'd have a choice. Personally, I'd say that goes against the entire mythos of calling demons - the better you know your target (like, knowing its name), the easier it is to call. Also, it doesn't really make sense that a more specifically targeted application of a spell would be [i]weaker[/i] than a very specific application. Second, you've set up an odd situation whereby, so long as I can get a category close enough without naming something specifically, I can pull that something in without problem. Sure, you can't cast the spell, call for Asmodeus specifically, and always expect him to show up, but if I allow the spell to pick "a general of Hell," well then, I figure I've got a 1 / 9 chance of getting him, whether he wants it or not! No, I think the answer lies in the two groupings: succinctly, "deities and like beings" and "everyone else." Asmodeus, as a General of Hell, is a "deity or like being." Grim'zk the Undying is powerful, but he's still "everyone else." Even Grim'zk's older brother, Hrazh-kul the We-Aren't-Joking-He-Really-Isn't-Ever-Going-To-Die (an MM standard Balor with 20 levels in Sorceror, 10 in Archmage, and 5 in Weapon Master), though more powerful than his brother, is still "everyone else." At some point, he may cross the line from "everyone else" to "deity or like being," but having a name or class levels *ain't* the spot that marks that line. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's a "unique being" for purposes of Gate?
Top