Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doghead" data-source="post: 2147017" data-attributes="member: 8243">Game talkGames I runI'm currently in the process of reviving my two games from a period of hibernation. For which I am wholly responsible. I was a away for a bit, and work has been a female dog. Both games are down to two players (from a high of about 8 in one at one time, and four in the other.) and I think that I will run with that. As Gomez mentioned, small party games run much faster so long as the players stick around. And the two I have in each have proven pretty tenatious. That said, I'm always willing to consider requests for places from new players. In general (if I am up to date) current character generation details can be found on the first page.Both of my games are a somewhat left of center dnd. Both use Ken Hood's Revised Grim'nGritty Rules. Nameless is set in a fairly conventional medieval fanatasy world, but uses a (rather rough and ready) classless generation system. Shamutanti Hills is based on the Steve Jackson book of the same name, and uses psionics rather than magic. The character generation system for Shamutanti is straight from the book (SRD actually).Games I play inI am in about 5 or 6 games, only three or four of which are active. It has seemed a little quieter around here lately, with a number of the regulars dropping of the radar. Uriel and Isida are two that spring to mind in my case. I hope things are all ok with them.GeneralI came (back) to this thread via Gomez's The State of Play for GMs thread. One of the down sides of PbP is the lack of general interaction, and I was a little disappointed to see it closed. I appreciate Brother Shatterstones interest in keeping the forum as streamlined as possible. Indeed his work generally has been thoughtful and constructive (thanks BS). But for what it is worth, I think a GM discussion thread (perhaps monthly, perhaps quarterly) would be a good thing - a place to get together and chat about various things with others doing something similar. I find GM'ing much more demanding that playing, and think having such a forum (in the general sense) would be helpful when feeling a little flat.While it is possible to discuss GM'ing stuff here, the scope of this thread is much larger and it focuses on different things. I don't think that a GM Talk thread need be stickied. It would work as a transient thing, coming around on a fairly regular basis.Anyway, thats my two cents worth. I thought I would mention it and see how others feel. Perhaps there isn't that much interest. But you never know unless you ask.thotd.</blockquote>

Verification