Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's happening with 3e?? Open Design, Necromancer Games, Sinister Adventures, Monte
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5058826" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>I think my subjective assessment of "significant" is different.</p><p></p><p>The races are very clearly boosted. I'd quibble on whether or not they are +1 LA, but it is certainly more than it was. And long before PF was ever thought of it was understood that LA races suffered to start with and only suffered more and more as they gained levels. A 1st level +1 LA race running with a group of 2nd level normal races would be fine or even a bit up. But by 6th or 7th level the perks of the race were being way outshined by the perks of the extra class level. There were all kinds of buy-off systems floating around as ways to fix this flaw. </p><p></p><p>So if you put a party of 1st level PF races against a party of 1st level 3.5 core races, the PF party will probably have a small but very real advantage. I wouldn't call it dominant. But maybe something on the order of expected to win out 11 or 12 times out of 20, everything else being equal.</p><p></p><p>Bump them up to 5th level and the advantage is gone. </p><p>They get a small boost at low levels exactly when they needed the boost and it fades away quickly.</p><p></p><p>As to classes, some classes got a boost. The bard for example. While the druid is still at the top of the scale, I'd say the PF druid has been pulled down a notch compared to 3.5. </p><p></p><p>It is too early on for me to be completely certain, but I'd say that my actual experience to date is that the span between the weakest and strongest characters is less than it was in 3.5 and that the same challenges I was throwing at 3.5 parties have the same kinds of outcomes.</p><p></p><p>I will agree that "waahoo" is a bit higher. Fighters have more depth, sorcerer bloodlines are cool, wizard specialties are more developed, etc... But I personally like these things. If I'm gonna play a low magic, swords and sorcery, Grim Tales game then, no, it doesn't need this. But 3X has always been a flashy fantasy game for me anyway. </p><p></p><p>If you want a bit more subdued game, PF has taken things a step further away from that. That is a very fair position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5058826, member: 957"] I think my subjective assessment of "significant" is different. The races are very clearly boosted. I'd quibble on whether or not they are +1 LA, but it is certainly more than it was. And long before PF was ever thought of it was understood that LA races suffered to start with and only suffered more and more as they gained levels. A 1st level +1 LA race running with a group of 2nd level normal races would be fine or even a bit up. But by 6th or 7th level the perks of the race were being way outshined by the perks of the extra class level. There were all kinds of buy-off systems floating around as ways to fix this flaw. So if you put a party of 1st level PF races against a party of 1st level 3.5 core races, the PF party will probably have a small but very real advantage. I wouldn't call it dominant. But maybe something on the order of expected to win out 11 or 12 times out of 20, everything else being equal. Bump them up to 5th level and the advantage is gone. They get a small boost at low levels exactly when they needed the boost and it fades away quickly. As to classes, some classes got a boost. The bard for example. While the druid is still at the top of the scale, I'd say the PF druid has been pulled down a notch compared to 3.5. It is too early on for me to be completely certain, but I'd say that my actual experience to date is that the span between the weakest and strongest characters is less than it was in 3.5 and that the same challenges I was throwing at 3.5 parties have the same kinds of outcomes. I will agree that "waahoo" is a bit higher. Fighters have more depth, sorcerer bloodlines are cool, wizard specialties are more developed, etc... But I personally like these things. If I'm gonna play a low magic, swords and sorcery, Grim Tales game then, no, it doesn't need this. But 3X has always been a flashy fantasy game for me anyway. If you want a bit more subdued game, PF has taken things a step further away from that. That is a very fair position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
What's happening with 3e?? Open Design, Necromancer Games, Sinister Adventures, Monte
Top