Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's In D&D's New Starter Set?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DinoInDisguise" data-source="post: 9605462" data-attributes="member: 7045806"><p>I don't know that WotC has any incentive to have a loss leader. Loss leaders in retail, as a small business owner, are used to get people in the door. You than expect that customer to purchase other items that have a higher margin to make up the difference. For a small business, I need a certain percentage margin to make my bills. Below that margin percentage my business slowly, or quickly, dies. Loss leaders lower that margin if unsuccessful in the above goal.</p><p></p><p>We can think of it this way. If I sell a product at a profit of $1, I make $10 if I sell 10. If I put that product at a price where I make 50 cents, I need to sell twice as many to make the same raw dollar amount. I'd be working harder for the same money in this comparison. This complicates the math on a loss leader, as it works the same with two items. If I sell two items for a profit of $2, and drop one to a loss leader at $0 profit. I'm selling the second one at cost. To make that make sense, financially, I need to sell twice as many of the first, profitable, item.</p><p></p><p>This is a gross oversimplification. But it illustrates why WotC may choose to not engage in that strategy. If they make $1 per starter set, just for illustration purposes, and $1 on each core book. And they loss leader the starter set to below cost at -$1 raw profit. They than have to increase the combined sales of the three core books by twice the amount of starter sets sold to just break even.</p><p></p><p>In this case they may take a break even for the increased customer base. But the decision is ultimately on whether there is enough potential customers or sales to be gained on other products to offset the cost of the loss leader. And that increase has to be a result of the loss leader. If the calculation is that most people will buy it at normal retail, or that the market is not likely to grow, they simply would have no reason to take the risk of making the starter set a loss leader.</p><p></p><p>I don't know that loss leaders make sense for WotC in this industry. They seem like they would be unlikely to see a rise in sales large enough to off set the cost. But that is a non-expert opinion as my small store doesn't compare to their billion dollar company.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: This is even harder if you are selling through partners, as those partners may choose to take the extra margin negating any real world effects of your loss leader. Meaning you'd just be burning money for, likely, no sales gain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DinoInDisguise, post: 9605462, member: 7045806"] I don't know that WotC has any incentive to have a loss leader. Loss leaders in retail, as a small business owner, are used to get people in the door. You than expect that customer to purchase other items that have a higher margin to make up the difference. For a small business, I need a certain percentage margin to make my bills. Below that margin percentage my business slowly, or quickly, dies. Loss leaders lower that margin if unsuccessful in the above goal. We can think of it this way. If I sell a product at a profit of $1, I make $10 if I sell 10. If I put that product at a price where I make 50 cents, I need to sell twice as many to make the same raw dollar amount. I'd be working harder for the same money in this comparison. This complicates the math on a loss leader, as it works the same with two items. If I sell two items for a profit of $2, and drop one to a loss leader at $0 profit. I'm selling the second one at cost. To make that make sense, financially, I need to sell twice as many of the first, profitable, item. This is a gross oversimplification. But it illustrates why WotC may choose to not engage in that strategy. If they make $1 per starter set, just for illustration purposes, and $1 on each core book. And they loss leader the starter set to below cost at -$1 raw profit. They than have to increase the combined sales of the three core books by twice the amount of starter sets sold to just break even. In this case they may take a break even for the increased customer base. But the decision is ultimately on whether there is enough potential customers or sales to be gained on other products to offset the cost of the loss leader. And that increase has to be a result of the loss leader. If the calculation is that most people will buy it at normal retail, or that the market is not likely to grow, they simply would have no reason to take the risk of making the starter set a loss leader. I don't know that loss leaders make sense for WotC in this industry. They seem like they would be unlikely to see a rise in sales large enough to off set the cost. But that is a non-expert opinion as my small store doesn't compare to their billion dollar company. EDIT: This is even harder if you are selling through partners, as those partners may choose to take the extra margin negating any real world effects of your loss leader. Meaning you'd just be burning money for, likely, no sales gain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's In D&D's New Starter Set?
Top