Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's MAD?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 4366747" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>MAD was a 3e phenomenon. Some classes needed several stats to be as high as possible to be really effective. Monks, for instance, needed high STR to be effective offensively, high DEX /and/ WIS to have good AC, high CON to have adequate hps for melee, and even a little INT since they had a good skill list. You couldn't afford all that, making the class less effective than it might apear at first glance.</p><p></p><p>4e doesn't have that so much - or, rather, everyone has it to a small extent. In 4e, most 'builds' have a 'primary' stat that you must take as high as possible, a 'secondary' stat that it's nice to have pretty high, and a tertiary stat you want to at least not suck. You get to boost two stats substantially as you level up, so it more or less works in that basic sense.</p><p></p><p>Where 4e runs into trouble is that part of the design philosphy seemed to include an abhorence of 'dump stats.' So, while your three good attributes are enough to take full advantage of your class, you probably end up missing out on desireable feats or having a particularly low defense. In addition, 4e stats are in pairs, the higher of each pair adding to a defense. So if any two of your three desireable stats are in the same pair (as with a Cleric wanting both CHA and WIS or a hammer-fighter wanting both STR and CON), you run into some inefficiency. If you spread your stats around to avoid missing out on feats and so forth, you primary suffers, /and/ you run into the 'stat polarity' problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 4366747, member: 996"] MAD was a 3e phenomenon. Some classes needed several stats to be as high as possible to be really effective. Monks, for instance, needed high STR to be effective offensively, high DEX /and/ WIS to have good AC, high CON to have adequate hps for melee, and even a little INT since they had a good skill list. You couldn't afford all that, making the class less effective than it might apear at first glance. 4e doesn't have that so much - or, rather, everyone has it to a small extent. In 4e, most 'builds' have a 'primary' stat that you must take as high as possible, a 'secondary' stat that it's nice to have pretty high, and a tertiary stat you want to at least not suck. You get to boost two stats substantially as you level up, so it more or less works in that basic sense. Where 4e runs into trouble is that part of the design philosphy seemed to include an abhorence of 'dump stats.' So, while your three good attributes are enough to take full advantage of your class, you probably end up missing out on desireable feats or having a particularly low defense. In addition, 4e stats are in pairs, the higher of each pair adding to a defense. So if any two of your three desireable stats are in the same pair (as with a Cleric wanting both CHA and WIS or a hammer-fighter wanting both STR and CON), you run into some inefficiency. If you spread your stats around to avoid missing out on feats and so forth, you primary suffers, /and/ you run into the 'stat polarity' problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's MAD?
Top