Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's New with the Artificer in Eberron: Forge of the Artificer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mephista" data-source="post: 9807919" data-attributes="member: 6786252"><p>Some thoughts -</p><p></p><p>Okay, so I'm actually a big fan of the changes to Artificer 2024 base class. There's a few minor pain points (mainly the weird way casting foci work, and lack of artificer-specific spells) but nothing I would consider a deal breaker, and the rest of the changes actively feel like they're going to be fun to play out. They seem to want to push the base Artificer towards being a dedicated caster class, rather than weapon user, with Battlemaster as the "gish" option. In many ways, they're the opposite of the warlock - instead of high level spells once or so a combat, we have a bunch of low level spells being spammed. Interesting take, but I think it works.</p><p></p><p>Artificer subclasses I'm actually a bit annoyed about - specifically Armorer and Cartographer. Armorer's lack of magic weapons is felt, and the level 9 feature that only gives +1 feels... bad. Overall, while level 3 is good, the scaling with the rest of the subclass is extremely lacking, and once you hit level 10 and get Spell Storing Item and Lightning Bolt, you're better off NOT using the subclass features at all. The damage you deal from the class features is on par with the damage from ALCHEMIST casting Firebolt. Sure, the Armorer comes with pseudo-Weapon Masteries, but the Alchemist gets to use Wand of the War Mage for better accuracy for most of play. The one redeeming feature is the ability to use Magic Weapon and Elemental Weapon, but if that's expected, shouldn't there be a feature or even inclusion on the spell list?! </p><p></p><p>And Cartographer? Sorry, a bit of a rant. So, they moved the free teleport down to 3, which is decent. They then turned the level 5 feature into something that boosts damage either when you cast an Artificer spell, or your artificer hits a critter under your Faerie Fire effect; you also don't drop Concentration on Faerie Fire due to damage. Here's the thing, though. Cartographer will never not be hitting with spells - either True Strike or a cantrip at minimum, so that hitting-under-FF-effect will never proc. Its always going to be a spell. And the sub-class as a whole is meant to be a support-buffer class of some kind, but you want it to rely on Faerie Fire, while almost all buffs are Concentration? Gods, if you're going to try and have a focus on FF, actually make it worthwhile for everyone to benefit from it! The subclass is playable, but... that's it. Its just minor teleport hijinks and Faerie Fire. Its entirely possible to feel like you don't really have subclass benefits compared to others. Oh! And they slightly fixed the spell list, and gave them... Call Lightning and Banishment. Both Concentration spells.</p><p></p><p>I don't know, it just feels like they don't understand how to scale things properly with these subclasses, to the point that you feel like its not worth using your features. That feels super wrong to me, tbh. I don't know. I'm thinking that they didn't quite figure out how to really mesh the old subclasses with the new direction of the base class.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mephista, post: 9807919, member: 6786252"] Some thoughts - Okay, so I'm actually a big fan of the changes to Artificer 2024 base class. There's a few minor pain points (mainly the weird way casting foci work, and lack of artificer-specific spells) but nothing I would consider a deal breaker, and the rest of the changes actively feel like they're going to be fun to play out. They seem to want to push the base Artificer towards being a dedicated caster class, rather than weapon user, with Battlemaster as the "gish" option. In many ways, they're the opposite of the warlock - instead of high level spells once or so a combat, we have a bunch of low level spells being spammed. Interesting take, but I think it works. Artificer subclasses I'm actually a bit annoyed about - specifically Armorer and Cartographer. Armorer's lack of magic weapons is felt, and the level 9 feature that only gives +1 feels... bad. Overall, while level 3 is good, the scaling with the rest of the subclass is extremely lacking, and once you hit level 10 and get Spell Storing Item and Lightning Bolt, you're better off NOT using the subclass features at all. The damage you deal from the class features is on par with the damage from ALCHEMIST casting Firebolt. Sure, the Armorer comes with pseudo-Weapon Masteries, but the Alchemist gets to use Wand of the War Mage for better accuracy for most of play. The one redeeming feature is the ability to use Magic Weapon and Elemental Weapon, but if that's expected, shouldn't there be a feature or even inclusion on the spell list?! And Cartographer? Sorry, a bit of a rant. So, they moved the free teleport down to 3, which is decent. They then turned the level 5 feature into something that boosts damage either when you cast an Artificer spell, or your artificer hits a critter under your Faerie Fire effect; you also don't drop Concentration on Faerie Fire due to damage. Here's the thing, though. Cartographer will never not be hitting with spells - either True Strike or a cantrip at minimum, so that hitting-under-FF-effect will never proc. Its always going to be a spell. And the sub-class as a whole is meant to be a support-buffer class of some kind, but you want it to rely on Faerie Fire, while almost all buffs are Concentration? Gods, if you're going to try and have a focus on FF, actually make it worthwhile for everyone to benefit from it! The subclass is playable, but... that's it. Its just minor teleport hijinks and Faerie Fire. Its entirely possible to feel like you don't really have subclass benefits compared to others. Oh! And they slightly fixed the spell list, and gave them... Call Lightning and Banishment. Both Concentration spells. I don't know, it just feels like they don't understand how to scale things properly with these subclasses, to the point that you feel like its not worth using your features. That feels super wrong to me, tbh. I don't know. I'm thinking that they didn't quite figure out how to really mesh the old subclasses with the new direction of the base class. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's New with the Artificer in Eberron: Forge of the Artificer
Top