Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 4588187" data-attributes="member: 5">Digging around a little bit I see that lawyers will still be in the picture but that it is Scott Rouse who is just the current, self-admitted obstacle to a more satisfactory GSL -11-26-2008 - <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4564801-post33.html" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/4564801-post33.html</a>I guess there really is no way to get a straight answer from him since, in the end, he does not know what will be approved nor how long it will take.  All Scott Rouse actually has control over is what he will pass on to the lawyers, his recommendations, and his hope that it fits with their final vision of what the GSL will turn out to be.  I suppose it is even possible that they will ultimately decide to either leave the GSL as is or add further restrictions to it based on whatever they have found they have not liked in the early, very thin crop of GSL products.  In fact, given the trend over the last year of how the licensing in all areas has been gathered back in so tightly (mags brought in house, major licenses and d20 revoked, etc.) and the glacial pace at which what little that has gotten done has gotten done, I do not believe that there is much room left for an optimistic outlook on what will come about from the efforts of Scott Rouse and his recently laid off compatriot, Linae Foster.</blockquote>