Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's Next for D&D's Campaign Settings? (And an idea/suggestion for WotC!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6223650" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I still believe there is no need for a "default" setting. It actually depends what it means, because if they say "FR is the new default" but then core books don't contain any FR-specific material that should be ignored when playing in other settings, then it really doesn't cause any harm.</p><p></p><p>3.0 had Greyhawk as default, and yet this only meant two things: Greyhawk deities in the PHB, and spell names containing Greyhawk NPC (notice how 3.5 cleverly messed up by having a prestige class in core taken from <em>another</em> setting...). The 5e domains system currently doesn't need any mention of deities in the PHB. Spell names could remain for tradition's sake, or they could make neutral names, it's not that big deal for me. Thus I don't see any reason for really having a "default" setting. There can be just generic books, and setting-specific books, no need to mess up the two things together.</p><p></p><p>Would be even worse for me if the default setting was going to be a new setting, because this means it would either be very fantasy generic (which we already have many that can be reused, and at least they would carry over some tradition with them) or stray away from classic D&D which guarantees troubles.</p><p></p><p>That said, 5e already has a default setting and it is Forgotten Realms, so there's nothing to advocate. But once again this means nothing if the actual character material in core and non-setting supplements doesn't contain FR-specific stuff.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>As for supporting other settings is additional books, the more the better!</p><p></p><p>My preference would be to focus on the main campaign setting sourcebooks, rather than the supplements. I would prefer they give precedence to one large FR campaign setting book containing all you need to play for a long time (compared to 3e FR books, I'd prefer one that would merge the FRCS, Manual of Faerun and Magic of Faerun, although not the entire of content of them is needed, so a 500-pages limit could be a good target), and then do the same for several more settings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6223650, member: 1465"] I still believe there is no need for a "default" setting. It actually depends what it means, because if they say "FR is the new default" but then core books don't contain any FR-specific material that should be ignored when playing in other settings, then it really doesn't cause any harm. 3.0 had Greyhawk as default, and yet this only meant two things: Greyhawk deities in the PHB, and spell names containing Greyhawk NPC (notice how 3.5 cleverly messed up by having a prestige class in core taken from [I]another[/I] setting...). The 5e domains system currently doesn't need any mention of deities in the PHB. Spell names could remain for tradition's sake, or they could make neutral names, it's not that big deal for me. Thus I don't see any reason for really having a "default" setting. There can be just generic books, and setting-specific books, no need to mess up the two things together. Would be even worse for me if the default setting was going to be a new setting, because this means it would either be very fantasy generic (which we already have many that can be reused, and at least they would carry over some tradition with them) or stray away from classic D&D which guarantees troubles. That said, 5e already has a default setting and it is Forgotten Realms, so there's nothing to advocate. But once again this means nothing if the actual character material in core and non-setting supplements doesn't contain FR-specific stuff. --- As for supporting other settings is additional books, the more the better! My preference would be to focus on the main campaign setting sourcebooks, rather than the supplements. I would prefer they give precedence to one large FR campaign setting book containing all you need to play for a long time (compared to 3e FR books, I'd prefer one that would merge the FRCS, Manual of Faerun and Magic of Faerun, although not the entire of content of them is needed, so a 500-pages limit could be a good target), and then do the same for several more settings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's Next for D&D's Campaign Settings? (And an idea/suggestion for WotC!)
Top