Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What's right about Star Trek(Opinion)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wombat" data-source="post: 2128553" data-attributes="member: 8447"><p>In many ways I am a Kennedy Space Child.</p><p></p><p>I was born in 1959, watched all the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo launches that I could. I also loved reading, old horror and sci films, etc. So, when Star Trek first came on, I was happy. I mean, let's be fair -- it's competition was <em>Lost In Space</em> ... which clobbered Star Trek in every single ratings group. But I loved to watch the adventures of the Enterprise and her crew. Trek fit perfectly into an era and an ideal, that the human race was still possibly perfectable, that if we could get to the Moon, we could do anything. In a lot of ways Star Trek was the last grand gasp of Science and Progress that our culture had inherited from the Victorian era, that things were getting Better, despite hiccups and setbacks. </p><p></p><p>During the "lost years" (prior to the films), I didn't join in the letter writing campaign or anything. I watched the reruns now and again and loved 'em. Every episode? Nope, there were some real clunkers, especially in the 3rd season ("Spock's Brain" anyone??). But still I loved the show. Maybe it seemed slightly less relevant during the end days of Vietnam, but that hopeful vision remained. </p><p></p><p>It became very fashionable later on to bash on Trek. especially after <em>Star Wars</em> came out (and then <em>Alien</em>). It was too "clean", too "nice", too "PC". Heck, I liked it for all those things (well, the PC thing might be a different issue, but we'll leave it for the moment). The Federation offered to let people join; they did not conquer like the Klingons and the Romulans. It was a spirit of hope, a dream of cooperation. Maybe this dream is easily derided nowadays, but I still hold to it.</p><p></p><p>Yet for all the things I loved in the original Trek, my favourite series remains Deep Space Nine. Why? Look at the characters you had -- Benjamin Sisko (trying, not always 100% succesfully, to be combat commander, diplomat, single father, project leader, and defacto religious icon in turn without losing his cool, a very difficult task), Major Kira (how does an ex-freedom fighter/terrorist become part of the mainstream again?), Constable Odo (what does it mean to be a man? What does it mean to know yourself?), Doctor Bashir (supped-up genius medical student, the bright eyes of old skool Star Fleet, yet coming to terms with what it takes to save some lives when others must be lost), and, of course, Plain, Simple Garak (spy, tailor, exile, and a person who has a hard time telling the truth even to himself). These are only some of the complex, compelling characters who, in many ways, are the culmination of what Trek was all about -- human, fallable, determined, confused, humourous, thoughtful, and ultimately hopeful even in the face of horrible adversity.</p><p></p><p>Each of the shows, even the animated series, had bits to add to the vision that people now sum up as Star Trek. Each of them offered a different view of the universe. Not all of these views have been consistent, but given that both TNG and DS9 lasted 7 seasons, the original series 3, and ENT & VOY about 5 each, that is a LOT of time on the tube -- inconsistencies are bound to pop up. Heck, Star Wars has about as many and in only six films. </p><p></p><p>No, I will not try to defend the whole canon of Trek. There is no point to this any more than there is to trying to defend every story about King Arthur. Many of the points gleefully contradict others. What's up with Klingons and their foreheads? When did the Borg first show up? Was Cochran from Earth or Alpha Centauri and was he a young guy or an old guy, white black? Who knows and, ultimately, who cares? Was <em>Doctor Who</em> always consistent? <em>Gunsmoke</em>? <em>Columbo</em>? Nope. Trek was more about morality tales set in space, like the old episodes of <em>The Twilight Zone</em> more about a message in a tale reflecting current reality than about creating a seamless overall vision. But for all that and all that, Trek has done pretty darn good by itself.</p><p></p><p>Kirk, Spock, and McCoy, love 'em or hate 'em, are part of the cultural vocabulary of US television. The other major characters are not quite there yet, but they are pretty close. </p><p></p><p>So here's to the hope that was born in space ... the final frontier.</p><p></p><p>May we never lose the courage to explore the next mystery.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wombat, post: 2128553, member: 8447"] In many ways I am a Kennedy Space Child. I was born in 1959, watched all the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo launches that I could. I also loved reading, old horror and sci films, etc. So, when Star Trek first came on, I was happy. I mean, let's be fair -- it's competition was [I]Lost In Space[/I] ... which clobbered Star Trek in every single ratings group. But I loved to watch the adventures of the Enterprise and her crew. Trek fit perfectly into an era and an ideal, that the human race was still possibly perfectable, that if we could get to the Moon, we could do anything. In a lot of ways Star Trek was the last grand gasp of Science and Progress that our culture had inherited from the Victorian era, that things were getting Better, despite hiccups and setbacks. During the "lost years" (prior to the films), I didn't join in the letter writing campaign or anything. I watched the reruns now and again and loved 'em. Every episode? Nope, there were some real clunkers, especially in the 3rd season ("Spock's Brain" anyone??). But still I loved the show. Maybe it seemed slightly less relevant during the end days of Vietnam, but that hopeful vision remained. It became very fashionable later on to bash on Trek. especially after [I]Star Wars[/I] came out (and then [I]Alien[/I]). It was too "clean", too "nice", too "PC". Heck, I liked it for all those things (well, the PC thing might be a different issue, but we'll leave it for the moment). The Federation offered to let people join; they did not conquer like the Klingons and the Romulans. It was a spirit of hope, a dream of cooperation. Maybe this dream is easily derided nowadays, but I still hold to it. Yet for all the things I loved in the original Trek, my favourite series remains Deep Space Nine. Why? Look at the characters you had -- Benjamin Sisko (trying, not always 100% succesfully, to be combat commander, diplomat, single father, project leader, and defacto religious icon in turn without losing his cool, a very difficult task), Major Kira (how does an ex-freedom fighter/terrorist become part of the mainstream again?), Constable Odo (what does it mean to be a man? What does it mean to know yourself?), Doctor Bashir (supped-up genius medical student, the bright eyes of old skool Star Fleet, yet coming to terms with what it takes to save some lives when others must be lost), and, of course, Plain, Simple Garak (spy, tailor, exile, and a person who has a hard time telling the truth even to himself). These are only some of the complex, compelling characters who, in many ways, are the culmination of what Trek was all about -- human, fallable, determined, confused, humourous, thoughtful, and ultimately hopeful even in the face of horrible adversity. Each of the shows, even the animated series, had bits to add to the vision that people now sum up as Star Trek. Each of them offered a different view of the universe. Not all of these views have been consistent, but given that both TNG and DS9 lasted 7 seasons, the original series 3, and ENT & VOY about 5 each, that is a LOT of time on the tube -- inconsistencies are bound to pop up. Heck, Star Wars has about as many and in only six films. No, I will not try to defend the whole canon of Trek. There is no point to this any more than there is to trying to defend every story about King Arthur. Many of the points gleefully contradict others. What's up with Klingons and their foreheads? When did the Borg first show up? Was Cochran from Earth or Alpha Centauri and was he a young guy or an old guy, white black? Who knows and, ultimately, who cares? Was [I]Doctor Who[/I] always consistent? [I]Gunsmoke[/I]? [I]Columbo[/I]? Nope. Trek was more about morality tales set in space, like the old episodes of [I]The Twilight Zone[/I] more about a message in a tale reflecting current reality than about creating a seamless overall vision. But for all that and all that, Trek has done pretty darn good by itself. Kirk, Spock, and McCoy, love 'em or hate 'em, are part of the cultural vocabulary of US television. The other major characters are not quite there yet, but they are pretty close. So here's to the hope that was born in space ... the final frontier. May we never lose the courage to explore the next mystery. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
What's right about Star Trek(Opinion)
Top