Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What's so bad about 4th edition? What's so good about other systems?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5625918" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>The weird thing is, 4e combat is both simpler and easier and at the same time it is longer, more complex, and in some ways tedious. Actually the thing is the more complex high level combats in earlier editions were easily as long and complex as any 4e combat. 4e combats also usually feature more elements than most of the ones in earlier editions (mainly because you can throw almost anything at this system and figure it out easily). So it is hard to generalize, but 4e's real weakness, or difference in any case is the old throw-away "4 orcs jump the party" kind of fight, which in the old days would be over in 15 minutes, and now takes the same hour as a boss fight.</p><p></p><p>Honestly though, tracking programs are a wonderful thing, but they do leave a lot to be desired. For one thing it is irritating to a lot of players to need to have a computer at the table. It is HANDY, no doubt, but also takes up space and can tend to become a time suck. Some of the tracking software is pretty nice, but none of it does everything, there's always that newfangled oddball wacky thing that doesn't fit in quite right and has to be done by hand. They also don't deal with the fact that players are faced with a large number of choices at the table, and many of them are fairly subtle tactical decisions. A LOT of players simply can't rush through that.</p><p></p><p>Lets say in the end that the game would be a LOT more accessible if the number of conditions and effects being tracked during a combat at any level averaged some small number, say 3, and if the number of things a player had to remember at any given time or decide between was also around 3. The human brain is good at focusing on 3 things. Once you go beyond that you're exceeding most people's ability to hold things in mind at one time. 4e REALLY REALLY could have used some human factors engineering.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5625918, member: 82106"] The weird thing is, 4e combat is both simpler and easier and at the same time it is longer, more complex, and in some ways tedious. Actually the thing is the more complex high level combats in earlier editions were easily as long and complex as any 4e combat. 4e combats also usually feature more elements than most of the ones in earlier editions (mainly because you can throw almost anything at this system and figure it out easily). So it is hard to generalize, but 4e's real weakness, or difference in any case is the old throw-away "4 orcs jump the party" kind of fight, which in the old days would be over in 15 minutes, and now takes the same hour as a boss fight. Honestly though, tracking programs are a wonderful thing, but they do leave a lot to be desired. For one thing it is irritating to a lot of players to need to have a computer at the table. It is HANDY, no doubt, but also takes up space and can tend to become a time suck. Some of the tracking software is pretty nice, but none of it does everything, there's always that newfangled oddball wacky thing that doesn't fit in quite right and has to be done by hand. They also don't deal with the fact that players are faced with a large number of choices at the table, and many of them are fairly subtle tactical decisions. A LOT of players simply can't rush through that. Lets say in the end that the game would be a LOT more accessible if the number of conditions and effects being tracked during a combat at any level averaged some small number, say 3, and if the number of things a player had to remember at any given time or decide between was also around 3. The human brain is good at focusing on 3 things. Once you go beyond that you're exceeding most people's ability to hold things in mind at one time. 4e REALLY REALLY could have used some human factors engineering. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
What's so bad about 4th edition? What's so good about other systems?
Top