Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Grimmjow" data-source="post: 6064000" data-attributes="member: 92704">sorry i didnt reply earlier but i was trying to figure out how to word this so that it wasn't just me rambling.Think back to the 4e DMG. They presented, was it 8?, player types to help the DM make adventures. Three of them were the &quot;Roleplayer&quot; &quot;Storyteller&quot; and &quot;Slayer&quot;. The first two like to act out there characters and be part of the story. I never understood why these were two different types but they are pretty much the same thing. To these two people what background they pick is going to be a cosmic choice along with the sub-race.For a slayer sub race and background wouldn't be as important as class and specialty&nbsp; Picking how you want to kill things (class) and how you want to do it better (specialty) He does have a good idea though. What happens when more sub-races come out?? just cause we have only two sub-races per race now, doesn't mean we wont have more in the future</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Grimmjow, post: 6064000, member: 92704"] sorry i didnt reply earlier but i was trying to figure out how to word this so that it wasn't just me rambling. Think back to the 4e DMG. They presented, was it 8?, player types to help the DM make adventures. Three of them were the "Roleplayer" "Storyteller" and "Slayer". The first two like to act out there characters and be part of the story. I never understood why these were two different types but they are pretty much the same thing. To these two people what background they pick is going to be a cosmic choice along with the sub-race. For a slayer sub race and background wouldn't be as important as class and specialty Picking how you want to kill things (class) and how you want to do it better (specialty) He does have a good idea though. What happens when more sub-races come out?? just cause we have only two sub-races per race now, doesn't mean we wont have more in the future [/QUOTE]

Verification