Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="amerigoV" data-source="post: 5690699">Oooo, awesome idea on going back to 3.5! That way 3.5 can finally be whole with the Complete Commoner and Plantonomicon! Or maybe they could make a book on undead constructs, since undead and constructs were the "filler" in most of the Monster Manuals (hmmm, I probably would buy a book call Dead Metal....). Yep, tons of fertile ground still left there! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/yawn.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yawn:" title="Yawn    :yawn:" data-shortname=":yawn:" /> Now, if Wizards could consistently make good modules, then we got another discussion. But Paizo already has that market.While people may or may not like 4e, the 3.5 line was done. It was either do 3.75 or  do "4e" (4e being "different", not necessarily being the current 4e). They decided to do something different. Paizo picked the 3.75*. But 3.5 is a cold corpse now - ain't nothing new to make other than a setting. Any why bother at this point.*I have wondered how many of the people that bitched about 3.5 being a money grab are Pathfinder lovers now (who, of course, would have cried foul to the high heavens if Wizards would have done the same thing). Ah well, I am too lazy to make a poll as I really do not care that much to know.I loved 3.x, but its now dead. I have no problem with that (and its not cuz of 4e - its cuz of Savage Worlds,  but that is a different story).Now, off to make some Undead Constructs...</blockquote>

Verification