Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="C4" data-source="post: 5580928" data-attributes="member: 93857">Clearly, math should have taken Expertise then. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Hybrids aren't my thing, so I can't comment on whether Hybrid Talent is a tax or not. If it is a tax as you say, then there is a better way to do hybriding.So you two want freedom of choice, excellent! No point having stuff that doesn't fit my character concept. So you wouldn't mind if my lazylord gave up his "half-level bonus to attack rolls" feat for a few extra feat slots, since he doesn't need it and I don't want it. And while I'm at it, I'll give up all his weapon proficiencies except for the sword he uses -- I'll use those two dozen feat slots to jack his leadership abilities. Because my character concept is a master tactician putz everything else, and the game is about choice right?That might be fun, but I suspect CharOp would have a field day with it. Suddenly the best builds would let their attack bonuses go to hell, fix it with Expertise and then use all the feats they would have spent on attack boosters to boost damage. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/worried.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-S" title="Uhm    :-S" data-shortname=":-S" />So far as I know, you're the only one in this thread talking about anyone wanting to hit on a 5.</blockquote>

Verification