Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 7287880" data-attributes="member: 92511">I am not sure there is an answer here without answering the question, "The 'worst' for what?" If you're in an intrigue and espionage campaign, I'd say a bunch of non-standard raced evoker wizards, warlocks, paladins, et al with big flashy powers who can't help but call attention to themselves.If you're in an adventure requiring a lot of intelligence, reasoning, puzzles and riddles, a group composed entirely of barbarians (or other bog-standard warrior types) might not be the best idea. In a world setting where arcane magic is persecuted by The One religion, being a party of wizards, clerics of deities other than The One, druids, sorcerers, eldritch knights, and the like is probably going to be a baaad idea...or [while I can see the allure of such a party in such a setting] at least make things ten times more difficult than they'd need be.Some might say -I certainly wouldn't. Love the classics. But some might- that the party of:Human/Male Fighter.Dwarf/Male Fighter.Elf/Male Eldritch Knight.Human/Female Cleric.Halfling/Male Thief....would be "the worst" because it is kind of D&D tropey or "boring" or whatever folks' probably with that kind of set up might be. So, there really is no answer without a definition for what "Worst" is supposed to mean.</blockquote>