Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Rackhir" data-source="post: 1337002" data-attributes="member: 149">A. The Explanation for why there were immortals was unecessary.B. The Explanation was stupid and clumsy. I remember when they were trying to explain it in the movie, you could tell the actors couldn't even believe it.C. The movie was so bad that it transcends mere awfulness and attains a state of such stupifying terribleness that in some ways it is actually worth watching, simply because it IS so monumentally awful. It's like a train wreck, you just can't look away.D The movie was so incoherently written, edited and produced that it should be taught in film school as an example of how not to make a movie. I remember one scene where they literally contradicted themselves from one sentence to the next. I have a suspicion that you probably saw the movie when you were much younger and probably incapable of understanding the true depths of awfulness that the movie posesses. Some things are best left as fond childhood memories. I found this out when I watched an episode of Speed Racer a few years ago. BTW <a href="http://www.imdb.com/bottom_100_films" target="_blank">http://www.imdb.com/bottom_100_films</a>Highlander II is rated as the 76th worst film ever made.Interestingly, though Druids (listed under it's french title for some reason) is rated the 36th worst movie of all time. Lambert certainly knows how to make a bad movie.Trivia point - He didn't know how to speak english in the first film. He was taught to speak his lines phonetically.</blockquote>

Verification