Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's wrong with Perception?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8724683" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>Regarding the high DCs for things in published works:</p><p></p><p>1. Failing a check often doesn't mean you can't keep trying. Failing most of those checks just means the PC needs to keep searching. Failing the roll can also mean success with a setback. Perhaps you <em>found</em> the trap, but will have disadvantage in disarming it (your next check) because you hit something while searching. Perhaps it took you four times longer to find the secret door?</p><p></p><p>2. Multiple PCs can do the same task. If the party is <em>convinced</em> there should be a secret door at the end of that corridor they can each take turn search, or can work in pairs and you grant them advantage.</p><p></p><p>For example, DC 20 is 5%, so lets say your 1st level party has the following modifiers for a Wisdom (Perception) check: +3, +0, +1, +4</p><p></p><p>That means you need to roll a 17 or a 20 or a 19 or a 16. The odds of them <em>all</em> failing is just over 50%.</p><p></p><p>So, while a single PC might find it hard, if they each are doing the same task, even those DC 20 are likely close to 50/50 IME.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, I assumed only ONE of the PCs in the group above <em>actually</em> had proficiency in Perception (the +4). The +3 was the cleric/druid/etc. high WIS, and the others are no WIS and decent WIS. Even the one PC with +4 could either be a Rogue with Expertise or a PC with WIS +2 and proficiency. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8724683, member: 6987520"] Regarding the high DCs for things in published works: 1. Failing a check often doesn't mean you can't keep trying. Failing most of those checks just means the PC needs to keep searching. Failing the roll can also mean success with a setback. Perhaps you [I]found[/I] the trap, but will have disadvantage in disarming it (your next check) because you hit something while searching. Perhaps it took you four times longer to find the secret door? 2. Multiple PCs can do the same task. If the party is [I]convinced[/I] there should be a secret door at the end of that corridor they can each take turn search, or can work in pairs and you grant them advantage. For example, DC 20 is 5%, so lets say your 1st level party has the following modifiers for a Wisdom (Perception) check: +3, +0, +1, +4 That means you need to roll a 17 or a 20 or a 19 or a 16. The odds of them [I]all[/I] failing is just over 50%. So, while a single PC might find it hard, if they each are doing the same task, even those DC 20 are likely close to 50/50 IME. FWIW, I assumed only ONE of the PCs in the group above [I]actually[/I] had proficiency in Perception (the +4). The +3 was the cleric/druid/etc. high WIS, and the others are no WIS and decent WIS. Even the one PC with +4 could either be a Rogue with Expertise or a PC with WIS +2 and proficiency. 🤷♂️ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
What's wrong with Perception?
Top