Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's wrong with the single-classed Ranger?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Christian" data-source="post: 421238" data-attributes="member: 381"><p>Here, I'll throw everything up front. Virtually every complaint I've ever seen about the ranger falls into these three categories:</p><p></p><p>1) The class is underpowered/out of balance compared to the other classes. ('The ranger is shafted!')</p><p></p><p>2) The abilities the ranger is given don't match a given concept of the wilderness warrior. ('I don't see rangers as two-weapon fighters/spellcasters/whatever.')</p><p></p><p>3) The ranger is 'front-loaded'; the most powerful abilities (the Track, Ambidex, and TWF feats) are granted at first level, and nothing of consequence comes in after that (at least not for a long time). Result: a proliferation of characters with one level in Ranger and the rest of their levels in Fighter, Rogue, and/or Barbarian. ('I'm tired of seeing mucnhkins take one level of ranger for the TWF ability!')</p><p></p><p>IME, I think 2) and 3) are pretty good points. Some added flexibility in the class would be a big improvement, and moving some of the special abilities to 2nd and/or 3rd level would make the class more interesting to develop (as well as less attractive to min/max multiclassing). IMC, I added some minimal tweaks to the class to do this (virtual feats don't apply until 2nd level, and there are choices other than Ambi/TWF available).</p><p></p><p>I heartily disagree with 1). Well, mostly, anyway. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> The ranger may be just a bit underpowered ... but not enough for me to worry about. I think that the root of this complaint actually lies in complaint #2. Players have a preconceived notion of what the ranger should be, and play the character according to that preconceived notion; then they complain that the character isn't good at filling that role. Playing a ranger character along the lines of how the class is actually designed makes for a pretty decent and effective member of a party.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Christian, post: 421238, member: 381"] Here, I'll throw everything up front. Virtually every complaint I've ever seen about the ranger falls into these three categories: 1) The class is underpowered/out of balance compared to the other classes. ('The ranger is shafted!') 2) The abilities the ranger is given don't match a given concept of the wilderness warrior. ('I don't see rangers as two-weapon fighters/spellcasters/whatever.') 3) The ranger is 'front-loaded'; the most powerful abilities (the Track, Ambidex, and TWF feats) are granted at first level, and nothing of consequence comes in after that (at least not for a long time). Result: a proliferation of characters with one level in Ranger and the rest of their levels in Fighter, Rogue, and/or Barbarian. ('I'm tired of seeing mucnhkins take one level of ranger for the TWF ability!') IME, I think 2) and 3) are pretty good points. Some added flexibility in the class would be a big improvement, and moving some of the special abilities to 2nd and/or 3rd level would make the class more interesting to develop (as well as less attractive to min/max multiclassing). IMC, I added some minimal tweaks to the class to do this (virtual feats don't apply until 2nd level, and there are choices other than Ambi/TWF available). I heartily disagree with 1). Well, mostly, anyway. :) The ranger may be just a bit underpowered ... but not enough for me to worry about. I think that the root of this complaint actually lies in complaint #2. Players have a preconceived notion of what the ranger should be, and play the character according to that preconceived notion; then they complain that the character isn't good at filling that role. Playing a ranger character along the lines of how the class is actually designed makes for a pretty decent and effective member of a party. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
What's wrong with the single-classed Ranger?
Top