Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kai Lord" data-source="post: 426179" data-attributes="member: 3570">You didn't answer the question because the question was not &quot;which is easier for the Rogue,&quot; but &quot;which is easier, a Ranger preparing spells or a Rogue finding an unbelievably obscure wand crafted by a class that rarely makes wands at all.&quot;&nbsp; You would have recognized this if you had paid attention to the context of where the discussion was at that point.I'm adding you to my Ignore List, hong, and I'm not telling you that as a petty &quot;I'm not listening to you, na na na na!&quot; though you and others might very well take it that way.&nbsp; I'm telling you because this is not the first or the second time I've seen you come onto a thread where people were enjoying a discussion and poison it with negativity and blind obtuseness that has no basis whatsoever in the context of the discussion, and when someone does that I think they should know.I have no problem with the many people who disagreed with me here.&nbsp; But jumping in without any clue whatsoever of what's even being discussed (Elven cloak and boots are better than Forestfold!&nbsp; I don't even know what Forestfold is!&nbsp; I can't answer a direct question!) just saps the entertainment value out of the discussion.&nbsp; Whether its intentional or not, its old.I'm surprised you haven't assaulted the thread with your signature wanger spam.To everyone else, sorry for the derailment.&nbsp; You won't have to endure another exchange between myself and hong again.&nbsp; We now return you to your regularly scheduled Ranger pimping.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kai Lord, post: 426179, member: 3570"] You didn't answer the question because the question was not "which is easier for the Rogue," but "which is easier, a Ranger preparing spells or a Rogue finding an unbelievably obscure wand crafted by a class that rarely makes wands at all." You would have recognized this if you had paid attention to the context of where the discussion was at that point. I'm adding you to my Ignore List, hong, and I'm not telling you that as a petty "I'm not listening to you, na na na na!" though you and others might very well take it that way. I'm telling you because this is not the first or the second time I've seen you come onto a thread where people were enjoying a discussion and poison it with negativity and blind obtuseness that has no basis whatsoever in the context of the discussion, and when someone does that I think they should know. I have no problem with the many people who disagreed with me here. But jumping in without any clue whatsoever of what's even being discussed (Elven cloak and boots are better than Forestfold! I don't even know what Forestfold is! I can't answer a direct question!) just saps the entertainment value out of the discussion. Whether its intentional or not, its old. I'm surprised you haven't assaulted the thread with your signature wanger spam. To everyone else, sorry for the derailment. You won't have to endure another exchange between myself and hong again. We now return you to your regularly scheduled Ranger pimping. [/QUOTE]

Verification